Bjørn: Thank you for the review and your time as well. Now I have a better idea of the overall structure and general flow.
Best regards, Victor On 6/15/10 3:32 AM, Thorbjørn Lindeijer wrote: > On 06/15/2010 12:40 PM, ext Victor Sardina wrote: >> In addition, what QtCreator branch should I compile? I keep resorting to >> 2.0, but have noticed that master has much more commits pushed to it, >> and faster as well? > > There are three main interesting branches atm: > > 2.0.0: To become the 2.0.0 release soon > 2.0: To become the 2.1 release together with Qt 4.7.0 > master: To become the 2.2 release > > You can read some of the rationale in the recent release schedule blog > from Eike: > > http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2010/06/09/updated-release-schedule-for-qt-47-qt-creator-20-and-qt-creator-21/ > > The 2.0 branch basically only receives bugfixes, some of which are > cherry-picked into the 2.0.0 release branch. All new feature development > is happening on master. Since the 2.0.0 release is almost ready, many > developers have moved on feature development on master. So master is a > lot more active as far as commits are concerned, but can also be > expected to be broken in some ways. > > Conclusion: at the moment, you'd generally compile 2.0 branch if you > want to use Qt Creator, and compile master if you want to develop Qt > Creator or provide early feedback. > > Regards, > Bjørn >
<<attachment: victor_sardina.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
