Gunnar Sletta wrote: > setProperty sets both dynamic properties (non-setX/x()) and normal > properties, so I feel the name is correct. The point is maybe that > there are no examples on this and the there could be better > documentation? Examples and documentation are always good.
I can see that using setProperty for both dynamic and normal properties may be appealing - however, I think that some people may wish to make it clear when they are using a dynamic property. I suppose they could do that by naming - dynamic properties start with "dyn" (eg. dynMyProperty) - but having a setDynamicProperty method available seems preferable to me. Maybe: setProperty would work as it does now setDynamicProperty would only work for dynamic properties setProperty would actually call setDynamicProperty when a dynamic property gets set And even a bigger Maybe: setProperty would no longer need to be final with the above design Todd. \ _______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
