Hardware: Intel Core 2 T5200 1.60 Ghz 1GB RAM Windows XP SP3
Thanks 2008/9/8 Massimo Fazzolari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Thanks Gunner for your quickly reply! > Yes, the following launches are fast. I referred to the first start on a > new machine. QtJambi create folder > "QtJambi_<username>_x86_4.4.0_01_msvc2005-20080820-1526" in C:\Documents and > Settings\<username>\Impostazioni locali\Temp. This operation is very time > expensive. I would like to know if i can skip this operation. > > Thank. > Best Regards > Max. > > > > > > > > > > 2008/9/8 Gunnar Sletta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Massimo Fazzolari wrote: >> >> Hi Gunner, >>> >>> Thanks for reply. I need about 20 seconds to start a simple qtjambi >>> application. I use QtJambi on Windows XP. This time is required by QtJambi >>> jar file and Qt DLLs. Other java native application start-up immediatly. A >>> native application like Chrome start-up in 3 seconds. How can reduce the >>> QtJambi start-up time? >>> >> >> This is odd. Starting com.trolltech.examples.AnalogClock for me takes >> about a second on my XP machine. The very first start on a machine is a bit >> slower (maybe 5 secs), but following launches are fast because the OS will >> cache the dll's in memory. >> >> Does AnalogClock always take 20 secs for you? What kind of hardware / jvm >> etc are you running this on? >> > >
_______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
