Hi Gunnar,
Thanks. Is there a possibility to *contribute* this from my side to help
you providing this (something like repository I can produce a patch
against)?
Tom
Gunnar Sletta schrieb:
> Tom Schindl wrote:
>>> Or did you mean to store arbitrary data? In which case, you could do
>>> this using a custom property, e.g.
>>>
>>> q.setProperty("MyData", new Integer(0));
>>>
>>> Integer i = (Integer) q.property("MyData");
>>>
>>
>> This is what I need thanks. Just an idea make it more Java 5 like
>> QObject#property(String) could be defined like this:
>> public <V> V property(String key)
>> then the cast is inserted by the compiler and you can simply write:
>> Integer i = q.property("MyData");
>>
>> Just an idea.
>>
>> Another one I outlined in one of my last posts is to provide QT-Jambi
>> as OSGi-Bundles for automatic use in OSGi-based applications. Is there
>> something like a Feature-Tracker where enhancements like this can get
>> requested?
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> You can track this suggestion here:
>
> http://trolltech.com/developer/task-tracker/index_html?id=232380&method=entry
>
>
> It will be visible as soon as the task-tracker syncs its database.
>
> best regards,
> Gunnar
_______________________________________________
Qt-jambi-interest mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
