Hi Eskil, Ok - I fetched the sources, made my changes (adding the OSGi-Support) but there's no documentation on gitorious.org how I can now push my changes to my own repository (I didn't find any documentation on how I'm supposed to do this) so that other could take a look.
Another problem I see is that Java-Classes generated from the C-Headers are not part of the repository (e.g. com.trolltech.qt.core.QObject) but have to be generated from the developer before all Java-Classes can get compiled. I know that things that can get generated should not be part of the repository but if you want to lower the burden for developers to contribute it would certainly make sense that the stuff one is checking out from GIT compiles without any additional generation step (including configuration, ...). This makes it much easier for a medium Java-Developer to contribute to the project's Java-Code (like I added support for OSGi which only needs changes in Java-Code). I'd add a special comment in the Java-Files that they are generated automatically and therefore changing them is senseless because modifications are lost when they are generated the next time. I'd also generated them to special-directory like "src/main/genjava" (See below for directory-structure). If NOT adding the autogenerated files to the repository a small HOWTO-setup for Java-Development would be highly appreciated (I didn't managed to get the code compiled because I didn't found out what I have to call to get the files generated) Another thing which would be nice for people like me who use an IDE is that the JavaSources are in an extra-directory say "src/main/java" if you want to follow the maven-naming scheme because then one can point the IDE to this directory instead of the root of the project. This once more makes it easier for standard java-developers to get started with the project. Another question I have is about the 64-bit. In the last release the .class-Files have been the same for all platforms. Is this still true now with 64-bit/32-bit support or are the 32bit and 64bit specific-class-files? Tom Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt schrieb: > Vítězslav Košina wrote: >> on ftp.qtsoftware.com is QT-Jambi version 4.5 like file qtjambi-src - >> lgpl-4.5.0_01.tar.gz. >> >> I haven't seen any announce. Is it real QT-Jambi 4.5 and development of QT- >> Jambi will be done now by comunity? >> > > Hi, > > it's the real Qt Jambi 4.5 :-) > > The release announcement just went out now. > > Read my blog for more details: > > http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2009/05/11/qt-jambi-450_01-released-contributors-wanted/ > > -- Eskil > > > _______________________________________________ > Qt-jambi-interest mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest _______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
