I also think that QTJAMBI have a chance , I personaly dont care much about designer and special tools for exporting because coding gui in QTJAMBI is very clean with small amount of code when doing well , thanks to css f.e. and well designed api . I have used SWING in the past and for me it is forgotten tehnology , and SWT is also far behind QT in features and development effort . If I will not stop using QTJAMBI and there will be need I will learn generator and build new version .
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Gunnar Sletta <[email protected]> wrote: > Helge Fredriksen wrote: > > Dear Eskil, > > > > Just to follow up my previous post, are you able to depict something > > about coming technology changes in the Qt framework that might inflict > > on the Jambi support for the upcoming Qt releases? > > I see Eskil beat me to it, but I'll post my full answer anyway ;) > > This really depends on the feature ;) > > Most features in Qt come in the form of a new class, function or enum to > some existing set of API's, thus extending what is there with a little > bit more. This kind of funcitonality is usually trivial to add to Qt > Jambi. New functions you will get by default, like for instance > QGraphicsView::isTransformed(). > > New classes are added by figuring out how its used and then specifying > it as either a <value-type>, <object-type> or <interface-type> in the > typesystem. Figuring out which is which requires some insight into what > the difference between the types are, but it quickly becomes > self-explanatory. > > Enums are similarily added by putting the <enum-type> or <enum-value> > into the typesystem. > > This will cover most of the new features to Qt that will come in the > future. > > - > > Then there are the "other things"... For instance kinetic / declarative > UI / QML. I don't know how the final toolchain for this will behave, but > say that you want to export your custom widgets into this framework then > this goes via a C++ plugin, so a C++/java integration plugin would be > required for this to work. Not to mention if this was ever integrated > into designer, etc... > > These bigger features will be quite a bit of work to support, I think. > At least, they have been in the past ;) > > best regards, > Gunnar > _______________________________________________ > Qt-jambi-interest mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest > -- S Pozdravom / Best Regards Rene Dohan http://inno.localnet.sk http://www.qualityunit.com
_______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
