On Wednesday 30 of September 2009 16:10:35 Aekold Helbrass wrote: I must honestly say, that I absolutely misunderstood this :)
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Dusan Zatkovsky <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 30 of September 2009 15:43:13 Dusan Zatkovsky wrote: > > > > Maybe, what about following idea - start a thread with will repeatelly > > call QApplication.processEvents() in acceptable interval? Then I should > > do my job in main thread, show messageboxes etc... > > > > What do you think? > > No, I don't think it will work. And also amount of work will not be > much bigger than implementing something similar to SwingWorker. > > Idea of SwingWorker: > > private ValueHolder valueHolder; > private final Object valueLockObject = new Object(); > > // assume this is method where your operation begins: > private void mainMethod() { > QApplication.invokeLater(new WorkerClass()); > for (int i = 0; i < 666; i++) { > int v = 0; > // do you calculations here > valueHolder.setValue(v); > } > // to stop events sending: > valueHolder = null; > } > > private class ValueHolder { > > int value; > > public int getValue() { > return value; > } > > public void setValue(int value) { > this.value = value; > } > > } > > private class WorkerClass implements Runnable { > > public void run() { > ValueHolder _v; > synchronized (valueLockObject) { > if (valueHolder == null) { > return; > } > _v = valueHolder; > valueHolder = new ValueHolder(); > } > // set you progress bar value from here > // ... > > // and after you have it - put another executor into events > loop: QApplication.invokeLater(new WorkerClass()); > } > > } > _______________________________________________ > Qt-jambi-interest mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest -- Dusan _______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
