On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Helge Fredriksen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > our friend Francis Galiegue answered this some time ago: > > * the uptodate properties need rework; > * Version.java must go in its current form (the version is > hardcoded!!); the plan is to introduce a version.properties file and > make Version.java read from it; added bonus, this will allow to detect > whether we try to build against an incompatible version of Qt (qmake > -query QT_VERSION vs version.properties); > > So, I guess that on short term fix is just to update the Versjon.java > file, however, > I agree about editing a property file instead of hardcoding things... > > Haven't heard much from Francis lately, are you still there? > > Do you plan to merge your branch into the community-port-to-4-6 repo? >
I've been quite busy lately but I'm ready to get back on track. I have tried some other things and failed them in the meanwhile, so the branch is current as far as I'm concerned. I also saw that two more commits are on the master branch, and the merge is not done yet As for the merge, well, I've been waiting for some feedback before the merge :p I can help with git if you don't know how to checkout a branch other than master. -- Francis Galiegue, [email protected] "It seems obvious [...] that at least some 'business intelligence' tools invest so much intelligence on the business side that they have nothing left for generating SQL queries" (Stéphane Faroult, in "The Art of SQL", ISBN 0-596-00894-5) _______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
