José Arcángel Salazar Delgado kirjoitti maanantai 12 huhtikuu 2010 23:24:17: > > Hi, > > > > Francis Galiegue kirjoitti maanantai 12 huhtikuu 2010 19:15:09: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I've been trying in the last few days to do a "ant configure" target. > > > It works quite well, but my trouble is: Windows. > > > > > > Here is what I can do: > > > > > > * take an initial configuration file, > > > * detect what libs are available, and fail configure if some libs are not > > > found, * detect whether uic.cpp is present and if not, don't build the > > > designer. > > > > I included uic in the juic dir. This is because UIC can change even before > > minor versions (and building juic against system qt will not be possible > > otherways. This disables both juic and examples from compilation, which > > isn’t really what I’d want) > > > > > In the build system, I managed to use a pure ant solution to find/copy > > > the QT libs (the qmake commands help a LOT), but I also had to resort > > > to native commands to find non QT libs (in particular, under Gentoo, > > > libstdc++.so.6 is _not_ in /lib or /usr/lib, but gcc > > > -print-search-dirs tells everything you need). > > > > Please, commit your changes in a way it doesn’t change the building system > > (force configuration), I think I could benefit from this change... I’ve > > done changes in build system which allows flexible building against system > > qt using few variables. > > > > RPath system seems like bad idea in general, is it really needed or even > > used at all; shouldn’t libraries be able to get dependencies from same > > directory anyway? RPaths pretty much just disable finding of libraries > > using LD_LIBRARY_PATH... > > > > More about this topic can be asked from me at #qtjambi @ irc.freenode.org > > > > > But what about Windows? I only have Linux and it works perfectly. I > > > just think MSVC* should officially be DESUPPORTED, they are just too > > > much of a trouble. MinGW, on the other hand, is supported by Qt, easy > > > to install and has the basic shell commands needed. As to Mac OS X, > > > well, it's bash and coreutils, so not much is needed to adapt. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > By new mingw compiler we can make proper binaries for Jambi, but I haven’t > > yet looked it due lack of time. > > > > I’m in favor of dropping MSVC support, though, this being community driven > > project, I wonder we can really in this stage claim what is stable and > > what isn’t. > The only problem with that is the lack of phonon support using mingw. I will > check the MSVC support to see if I can fix it.
It were fixed by new mingw compiler(4.4) and qt 4.6 AFAIK. > > > > Do we have any Mac developer who could do mac packages and test on that > > platform? > I have a partner that have a mac. Let me check if he can provide for a few > time. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qt-jambi-interest mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest > -- Terveisin, Samu Voutilainen http://smar.fi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
