Hi Minjung
Thanks for your reply, may be I should check meego code, because I can't find 
any platform service for bluetooth. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> [email protected].
> com 
> [mailto:qt-mobility-feedback-bounces+wen.zhang=windriver.com@q
> t.nokia.com] On Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 1:43 PM
> To: Zhang, Wen (Sky); [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Qt-mobility-feedback] TP1.2 bluetooth API
> 
> Hi Zhang,
> 
> Mobility is relying on the platform service. There is no 
> daemon process that Mobility provides.
> 
> Regards,
> Min
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Zhang, Wen (Sky) [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, 17 January 2011 3:34 PM
> To: Shin Minjung (Nokia-MS-Qt/Brisbane); [email protected]
> Cc: Stanley-Jones Andrew (Nokia-MS/Brisbane); 
> [email protected]
> Subject: RE: TP1.2 bluetooth API
> 
> Hi Minjun
> After study the bluetooth API code, and I want to know 
> qt-mobility have a service or daemo for bluetooth which run 
> on the background to receive the signal from blueZ?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: 
> > [email protected].
> > com
> > [mailto:qt-mobility-feedback-bounces+wen.zhang=windriver.com@q
> > t.nokia.com] On Behalf Of [email protected]
> > Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 12:48 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]; 
> [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Qt-mobility-feedback] TP1.2 bluetooth API
> > 
> > Hi Shane,
> > 
> > Thank you very much for your feedback.
> > 
> > The mailing list address has been changed from 
> > [email protected] to 
> > [email protected].
> > 
> > Regarding OBEX, we only provide a simple API to support 
> file transfer 
> > in 1.2. We are leveraging the platform OBEX implementation. i.e. we 
> > won't have a Qt API to fully implement OBEX specification. We will 
> > look at the extensibility again.
> > 
> > Thanks again.
> > 
> > Kind regards,
> > Min
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext [email protected]
> > [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Friday, 14 January 2011 11:06 PM
> > To: Shin Minjung (Nokia-MS-Qt/Brisbane)
> > Subject: FW: TP1.2 bluetooth API
> > 
> > Hi Minjung,
> > 
> > I posted this to the mailing list, but it didn't seem to arrive.
> > A lot of these suggestions can be done after 1.2, but there 
> are some 
> > issues where the 1.2 API would be hard to maintain.
> > 
> > The OBEX API in particular doesn't look ready for release, 
> as it looks 
> > hard to implement other obex operations within that framework.
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > 
> > Shane Kearns
> > 
> > --
> > Communications with Accenture or any of its group companies 
> > ("Accenture Group") including telephone calls and emails (including 
> > content), may be monitored by our systems for the purposes 
> of security 
> > and the assessment of internal compliance with company policy. 
> > Accenture Group does not accept service by e-mail of court 
> > proceedings, other processes or formal notices of any kind.
> >  
> > Accenture means Accenture (UK) Limited (registered number 4757301), 
> > Accenture Technology Solutions Limited (registered number 
> 4442596), or 
> > Accenture HR Services Limited (registered number 3957974), all 
> > registered in England and Wales with registered addresses at 30 
> > Fenchurch Street, London EC3M 3BD, as the case may be.
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kearns, Shane
> > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 14:39
> > To: '[email protected]'
> > Subject: TP1.2 bluetooth API
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I have some review comments on the APIs for Bluetooth in the
> > 1.2 tech preview.
> > My background is having debugged many of the S60 bluetooth 
> profiles, 
> > so there may be a symbian bias. I'm fairly familiar with 
> the bluetooth 
> > 2.x specifications but don't know how many of the optional features 
> > are currently implemented in bluez.
> > 
> > The email is quite long, but broken down by class in the API.
> > 
> > * QBluetooth::SecurityFlags
> > 
> > I would expect to see some flags related to "man in the middle" 
> > protection levels here.
> > These are used in Bluetooth 2.1 to determine what types of secure 
> > simple pairing are allowed.
> > With the current API, the backend would need to pick a 
> default (which 
> > might prevent a bluetooth profile being implemented 
> according to spec 
> > if using Qt Mobility) On symbian, the equivalent is 
> > TBTAccessRequirementsMitmProtection
> > 
> > If the backend is implemented on top of a pre 2.1 stack, it 
> can ignore 
> > these flags and only apply the BT1.0 flags you already 
> defined. (S60 
> > 3.x has a 2.0 stack, S60 5.0 has a 2.1 stack)
> > 
> > * QBluetoothDeviceDiscoveryAgent
> > 
> > Quite OK, but the list of errors is inadequate. (unknown error for 
> > everything) "bluetooth is switched off" for example.
> > 
> > Possible API extensions:
> > There should be an option to skip name lookup (it's much faster, 
> > suitable for some non UI usage)
> > (maybe) There should be an option to filter on class of device (not 
> > good to rely on, e.g. both a printer and a computer could offer the 
> > printing service) There should be an option to filter on 
> service uuid
> > 
> > In the documentation you should warn people that the
> > finished() signal could take minutes to come. (e.g. office 
> environment 
> > where everyone has a phone and PC with bluetooth
> > discoverable)
> > 
> > * QBluetoothDeviceInfo
> > 
> > Needs a DataCompleteness function for the name (name 
> request can time 
> > out)
> > majorDeviceClass() returns an enum, but that doesn't define all 
> > possible values. (major classes 9-30 are reserved but could be 
> > assigned at any time) I don't think
> > manufacturerSpecificData() needs the bool pointer, as the 
> caller can 
> > use isEmpty() / isNull() on the QByteArray returned.
> > 
> > * QBluetoothLocalDevice
> > 
> > setHostMode and powerOn should be requests (power on can be 
> slow), and 
> > they can fail so you need a way to signal failure.
> > The hostModeChanged signal can be used for success.
> > Should there be a powerOff? or is setHostMode(0) sufficient?
> > Should there be a setName? (which can also fail) If the device is 
> > connectable and discoverable, is the host mode 3 (as in the 
> HCI) or 2 
> > (since being discoverable but not connectable is not 
> useful)? Either 
> > way doc needs clarification.
> > 
> > * QBluetoothServiceDiscoveryAgent
> > 
> > Since symbian's SAX style API was so hard to use and S60's API was 
> > broken, I'm sympathetic to this API returning complete service 
> > records.
> > To avoid excessive memory use, make sure that it is 
> possible to call 
> > clear() from the serviceDiscovered() signal handler.
> > The combination of all devices and full discovery is particularly 
> > dangerous. (although some bluetooth stacks stupidly require user 
> > intervention to allow connections to SDP so it will get 
> stuck in the 
> > tar pit in practice)
> > 
> > Why is the bluetooth address a constructor parameter, but the uuid 
> > filter is a property?
> > It would make sense to set bluetooth address in the same 
> way as uuid 
> > filter.
> > 
> > * QBluetoothServiceInfo
> > 
> > SDP data element sets can contain data element alternates and vice 
> > versa.
> > The Alternative and Sequence inner classes contain lists of 
> QVariant, 
> > you don't appear to publish the integer user type for casting.
> > is QVariant::canConvert<QBluetoothServiceInfo::Alternative>()
> > and QVariant::value() sufficient for all cases?
> > 
> > socketProtocol() should return an int, and the enum values 
> should be 
> > defined to match the bluetooth assigned numbers spec. (e.g. 
> > QBluetoothServiceInfo::L2capProtocol = 0x100 and 
> > QBluetoothServiceInfo::RfcommProtocol = 0x3). That way the 
> application 
> > can understand protocols that QBluetooth does not.
> > 
> > can protocolServiceMultiplexer() and serverChannel() be 
> combined into 
> > a single API? The socketProtocol() tells you wha t protocol to use, 
> > and these are equivalent to the "port"
> > in TCP or UDP sockets.
> > 
> > It would be nice to have overloads of serviceName / 
> serviceDescription 
> > / ServiceProvider which take a QLocale::Language parameter 
> and return 
> > the language specific description if one is available. (In practice 
> > most services only have a primary language defined)
> > 
> > * QBluetoothSocket
> > 
> > There are way more errors than ConnectionRefusedError - 
> > PageTimeoutError,ServiceNotFoundError for example
> > 
> > connectToService() needs overloads which take a 
> > QBluetooth::SecurityFlags The client as well as the server can 
> > initiate encryption (and this is mandatory for 
> qualification of some 
> > bluetooth profiles) The connectToService overloads which 
> takes a uuid 
> > or QBluetoothServiceInfo could result in either an RFCOMM or L2CAP 
> > socket being opened, so there needs to be some way of querying this 
> > after connected. (For example, OBEX can be implemented over both 
> > legacy RFCOMM and efficient L2CAP)
> > 
> > For L2CAP sockets, you need a way to request an unreliable (flow 
> > control mode) connection, the default should be reliable 
> ([enhanced] 
> > retransmission mode or basic mode depending on stack capabilities). 
> > Unreliable connections are used for isochronous services such as 
> > audio.
> > 
> > socket descriptors are not ints on symbian - if you hope 
> for that API 
> > to be usable to import/export sockets to native code, it 
> will probably 
> > only work on bluez backend.
> > 
> > Deriving from QIODevice was the right decision for API consistency.
> > 
> > * QBluetoothUuid
> > 
> > The bool* ok=0 parameters are not very Qt like.
> > I hope a qWarning is printed if conversion fails and ok is null 
> > pointer The user can call minimumSize first to know if the 
> conversion 
> > will succeed or not.
> > 
> > * QL2CapServer and QRfCommServer
> > 
> > Consistent with QTcpServer, which is good.
> > 
> > Listen has a default port of 0, which presumably means 
> "auto assign a 
> > port and find out what was assigned by calling serverPort()" - this 
> > needs to be documented. Also need to document what the 
> default address 
> > means on a system with multiple bluetooth interfaces (which 
> you imply 
> > support for with this API and with 
> QBluetoothLocalDevice::allDevices)
> > 
> > You should implement errorString() too, to give debug 
> information when 
> > a function fails (as in QTcpServer)
> > 
> > * QBluetoothTransfer[*]
> > 
> > Needs a lot more work to be useful.
> > Consider how you would handle persistent OBEX connections 
> for profiles 
> > such as FTP, PBAP and MAP.
> > More operations are needed such as SETPATH
> > 
> > I think these need to be considered before releasing something that 
> > only works for limited OPP and may not be easily extensible 
> to other 
> > use cases.
> > 
> > An OBEX server API is also needed, but could be separate from this 
> > client only API.
> > 
> > btw, are you using the OS implementations of OBEX?
> > 
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > 
> > Shane Kearns
> > --
> > Communications with Accenture or any of its group companies 
> > ("Accenture Group") including telephone calls and emails (including 
> > content), may be monitored by our systems for the purposes 
> of security 
> > and the assessment of internal compliance with company policy. 
> > Accenture Group does not accept service by e-mail of court 
> > proceedings, other processes or formal notices of any kind.
> >  
> > Accenture means Accenture (UK) Limited (registered number 4757301), 
> > Accenture Technology Solutions Limited (registered number 
> 4442596), or 
> > Accenture HR Services Limited (registered number 3957974), all 
> > registered in England and Wales with registered addresses at 30 
> > Fenchurch Street, London EC3M 3BD, as the case may be.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain 
> > privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you 
> > have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and 
> > delete the original.  Any other use of the email by you is 
> prohibited.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qt-mobility-feedback mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-mobility-feedback
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-mobility-feedback mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-mobility-feedback
> 
_______________________________________________
Qt-mobility-feedback mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-mobility-feedback

Reply via email to