Hi, Am Dienstag 05 Oktober 2010 schrieb alex.blas...@nokia.com: > As David pointed out there are potentially multiple sources and the device > name is not always standardized. Therefore we There is no device name involved in talking to gpsd. This is exactly what gpsd abstracts.
> didn't feel that hard coding would be appropriate. What might work on your > desktop may not be a universal truth. The use of gpsd is pretty universal. Please tell me a single gps aware linux app that doesn't use it. > Therefore we opted for the middle ground. While it is not generalized enough > for *all* desktops there is a pretty good starting point. By the way the > QNMEAPositionInfoSource works with Windows based NMEA devices too. At this > point your suggestion does break without further API changes. I am pretty sure it does not work with windows as windows device names are likely different from linux ones. Also your framework includes the possibility to provide a defaultsource completely transparent to the application. You just aren't using this under desktop linux. > Please keep in mind that Mobility does put focus on the Mobile platforms at > this stage. Yepp ... so i'll wait until it gets a little more mature. No problem. > While I wouldn't rule out that there is a bug in light maps the > QNmeaPositionInfoSource is tested. In fact, it is the fall back > alternative for each example if the platform doesn't have a default source. > Also looking at the code the satellite info source component it is clearly > optional. Again the NMEA file fallback would hit the same code path. Yes, if > you have a real NMEA source you have to change a couple of lines of code to > point to your device but that should be it. It doesn't even work with the fake nmea source! The replay is never started since there's no satellite simulation. And a working satellite setup is required to start the replay. Please, just give the current nmea simulation a try. It doesn't work. > LBNL I would not rule out that your NMEA source may have a slightly different > NMEA output which may lead to an parse As i said: Capturing the very same NMEA output to a file and doing a replay from that file works! > error. You could easily verify this by comparing the nmealog.txt with output > from your device. This would be a bug. LBNL we do not support NMEA 2000. This is not the problem. Regards, Till _______________________________________________ Qt-mobility-feedback mailing list Qt-mobility-feedback@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-mobility-feedback