Den 03-10-2011 07:04, Bartosh Wroblevksy skrev: > > One advantage of the loader approach is that you can animate between > > the two sources i.e you can slide out the old QML and slide in the QML > > etc (using multiple loaders, for example). > > This is a really good point. You can switch from one to screen to the > next with really nice animations. This, I believe, would be a lot harder > to do with the delayed slot approach. What do you think are the > advantages of the C++ delayed slot approach?
Basically none. There might be some differences in memory handling, but that's only temporary. Go with the pure QML approach. Bo Thorsen, Fionia Software. -- Expert Qt and C++ developer for hire Contact me if you need expert Qt help http://www.fioniasoftware.dk _______________________________________________ Qt-qml mailing list Qt-qml@qt.nokia.com http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-qml
