On 21 April 2010 02:00, <[email protected]> wrote: > > And, more important, the performances of QDeclarativeWebView are > > inferior to QWebView. > > That's interesting, since QDeclarativeWebView is faster on some hardware, > since it has an image cache (is the WebView.pixelCacheSize set large enough > for your screen?). Unfortunately, the only advice I can give is to profile > it. > I use "pixelCacheSize: 4000000" for the N900. Is that supposed to be enough? I can give you some links where, while loading, everything get's completely stuck. - www.repubblica.it - news.bbc.co.uk
> > What would be REALLY nice is that the rendering was done in a way that > > would allow panning around while loading. The slowly-ness would be much > > less perceived (like on iPhone). > > It is. > > WebView uses QWebPage, just as QWebView does, which is incremental. > Mmm, I'm confused. To me it doesn't seem like that. Performances on N900 HW are not very good and I don't see the "loading by tiles" that I would expect. I'm using a build of branch "4.7-fremantle" done on the 2010-03-30. Is that too much in the past? Do you advice me to do a build of QtWebKit directly? > > -- > Warwick > -- Ivan De Marino | Software Engineer | France Telecom R&D UK - Orange Labs w. +44 20 8849 5806 | m. +44 7515 955 861 | m. +44 7974 156 216 ivan[dot]demarino[at]orange-ftgroup.com | ivan[dot]de[dot]marino[at]gmail[dot]com www.detronizator.org | www.linkedin.com/in/ivandemarino
_______________________________________________ Qt-qml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-qml
