It was my understanding (and perhaps someone working on qt-components can clarify) that the underlying architectural model renders this a non-issue.
You can always stick a new 'presentation layer' on the component if you don't like the default 'chunky for poking with a finger' style. Simon. -----Original Message----- From: ext Sean Kelley [mailto:sean.v.kel...@gmail.com] Sent: 02 July 2010 15:03 To: Turvey Simon (Nokia-MS/London) Cc: qt-qml@trolltech.com Subject: Re: [Qt-qml] Public place to share QML components? I would also like to avoid overly handset / finger touchable focused component models. It would be great if the philosophy going into Qt components is such that they are flexible enough for use on set-top/netbook/desktop deployments as well. Thanks, Sean On Jun 29, 2010, at 4:40 AM, <simon.tur...@nokia.com> <simon.tur...@nokia.com> wrote: > Actually I think this is an awesome idea and one that I was talking about > with some colleagues just a couple of days ago. An open source repository is > one part of this but not the whole story. It seems essential to me that a > language designed for such rich visual expression should have a visual > element to the public library. I would love to be able to browse a catalogue > of contributed QML components. Maybe then I wouldn't have to have written > that darn slot machine spinner from scratch! > > +1 > > Simon. > > -----Original Message----- > From: qt-qml-boun...@trolltech.com [mailto:qt-qml-boun...@trolltech.com] On > Behalf Of ext Elliot Smith > Sent: 29 June 2010 11:32 > To: Gregory Schlomoff > Cc: qt-qml@trolltech.com > Subject: Re: [Qt-qml] Public place to share QML components? > > On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 11:25 +0100, Gregory Schlomoff wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> As the philosophy of QML is to provide only the building blocks and to >> let the developers create their own components, I often find myself >> writing a lot of reusable components. Stuff to add scrollbars to >> Flickable, or to make TextInputs appear like regular Text elements >> that become editable on double click, for example. >> >> I think it would be nice to have some place where people could share >> their components, like a public library of components. > >> What do you think? Is there any plans to do something like that? Maybe >> on the Qt developer network, for example? >> >> I'd love to hear your feedback on this idea > > Something like this? > > http://gitorious.org/qt-components > > It's an open source project, so you could start by committing patches to > that, I'd guess. > > Elliot > >> _______________________________________________ >> Qt-qml mailing list >> Qt-qml@trolltech.com >> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-qml > > -- > Elliot Smith > Intel Open Source Technology Centre > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Intel Corporation (UK) Limited > Registered No. 1134945 (England) > Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ > VAT No: 860 2173 47 > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. > > _______________________________________________ > Qt-qml mailing list > Qt-qml@trolltech.com > http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-qml > > _______________________________________________ > Qt-qml mailing list > Qt-qml@trolltech.com > http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-qml _______________________________________________ Qt-qml mailing list Qt-qml@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-qml
