On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:54 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 16/09/2010, at 4:33 AM, ext Alex wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 8:34 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 15/09/2010, at 8:58 AM, ext Alex wrote: >> >>>> Here is a side-by-side comparison of how availableFonts.qml looks when >>>> run using QML Viewer vs QDeclarativeEngine. >>>> >>>> http://members.shaw.ca/amonjushko/font_render_quality.png >>>> >>> >>> The difference in the two is that QML Viewer uses a QGLWidget as the >>> viewport of its QDeclarativeView, and uses the "raster" graphics system. >>> >>> The basic issue has to do with with the fact that QML draws all of its text >>> to pixmaps. We've tried several approaches to fixing this, but at the >>> moment using raster is the best alternative. >>> >> >> Thanks, Michael. I was able to get good results by switching to the >> "raster" graphics system. Setting QGLWidget as the viewport does not >> seem to make any difference... is it supposed to? > > No, it shouldn't make any visual difference in this case -- we picked it in > conjunction with raster because it seemed to produce the best overall > combination on OS X (see for example the bug > http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-10685 which occurs under raster, > but not with raster + gl). >
Interesting. Thanks for the clarification. Cheers, Alex _______________________________________________ Qt-qml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-qml
