Thats true, application bundles are a good option on the
Mac for applications and shared libraries,
command line tools would still be an issue.
- DavidF
Boyd Waters wrote:
On Mar 12, 2008, at 4:01 PM, David Forstenlechner wrote:
static versions of the Qt libraries are pretty important to us,
since we plan to use it in a variety of contexts, some of which
require all dependencies to be contained in the binary.
Hmm..
Will a Qt/Cocoa binary even work without being packaged in an
application bundle? I don't think so, but I might be wrong.
But I think you'll need to put your binary in a directory structure like
MyApp.app/Contents/MacOS/myapp
and if that's the case, what's wrong with adding the Qt frameworks
inside that bundle?
In other words, if you will be required to ship a directory structure
anyway, it shouldn't make much difference to the end user what's in
that structure.
But I've never shipped a statically-linked Mac GUI application. So I
don't know.
- boyd
Boyd Waters
Scientific Programmer
National Radio Astronomy Observatory
Socorro, New Mexico
To unsubscribe - send "unsubscribe" in the subject to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe - send "unsubscribe" in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
