Em Quarta-feira 21. Outubro 2009, às 22.44.27, você escreveu: > > The changes are being upstreamed to webkit, so they should land there > > soon. See also https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24932. > > Good. I've bookmarked the web page. > > Some of the workarounds are not necessary if you change the compiler > flags. I use > QMAKE_CFLAGS = -errtags=yes -xc99 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 > -D__EXTENSIONS__ > QMAKE_CXXFLAGS = -library=stlport4 -errtags=yes > -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D__EXTENSIONS__ > > For instance, for this one > https://bug-24932-attachments.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=33639 > will then go away.
Indeed. Some of the patches were created when I was still trying to get it to
compile against RW STL (libCstd). They aren't necessary now that stlport4 is
necessary.
> (I use C99 since Qt 4.4 or 4.5 needed it, haven't gone back to trying C90).
>
> And while I'm at it ...
>
> QMAKE_CFLAGS_WARN_ON = -v
> QMAKE_CFLAGS_WARN_OFF = -w
> QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_WARN_ON = +w2 # but beware causes >10^5 warnings
I'll keep in mind.
> QMAKE_CFLAGS_RELEASE = -O # -fast if you're daring
>
> Currently qmake.conf uses -O2, which is less than the default -O
> optimization which is the same as -O3
Oh.
That's good to know.
> Last thing that I modify is to use my own versions of fontconfig and
> freetype. The /usr/sfw versions on Solaris result in a Qt with terrible
> jagged and badly rendered fonts.
Interesting. Because I got the same with the standard libraries in Solaris. I
thought it was an effect of the remote X I was using.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) nokia.com
Senior Product Manager - Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks
Sandakerveien 116, NO-0402 Oslo, Norway
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Qt4-preview-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt4-preview-feedback
