On Wednesday 18 May 2011, Artur Souza (MoRpHeUz) wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: > > Seems there's quite a few actually. > > The ones you listed are the ones that were there really early in the > process, even before I joined the effort :) I think these files > haven't been touched for a long long time now, at least I've never > touched them. Probably it was mainly Marius (Monsen) when he started > thinking about the project...sorry but I don't know enough about this > phase of the project to give you more information.. :( > > > If QAIM is not the future and itemviews-ng is not in Qt components, is > > there a replacement for the InterView system? > > Good question. IMHO we should give some love to the ItemView system for > Qt5...
to me, modulo a quite complex api, qaim is pretty good.. and for simple use cases qml views are not that bad (their support of models is limited, but the view part is already way better, real widgets as delegates ftw) only problem, they cover really really simple use cases (that could go for most mobile cases, not desktop for sure) what would be needed would be different qml primitives that would handle cases like treeviews or tables, that would be used mostly for desktop applications primitives because is not completely impossible emulating a more complex case with just qml but is not that great, is almost possible emulating a table with repeaters as rows but is not quite "it" -- Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
