28.05.2011, 03:59, [email protected]: > On 27/05/2011, at 5:33 PM, BRM wrote: > > There is also the various linker options to add the 'lib' directory in your > program path to the binary's search. > We install Qt to /usr/local/TrollTech/Qt-<version> on our systems and link > specifically against that path. No editing LD_LIBRARY_PATH on Linux. > > That's okay if you don't want your package to be relocatable. If you want a > relocatable package, using RPATH support (which I think is what you are > talking about here) breaks. But if you don't care about relocatable packages > and you know where your Qt libs will be installed (ie a very controlled set > of deployment machines), then RPATH does save you from having to modify > LD_LIBRARY_PATH. There's still the issue of QT_PLUGIN_PATH, but if you are > not providing your own designer plugins, etc., then that shouldn't affect > you. The situation on Mac is effectively the same as on Linux too.
It's always possible to use launcher script setting proper LD_LIBRARY_PATH exclusively for your application -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
