On Saturday 04 June 2011, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em Saturday, 4 de June de 2011, às 09:48:19, Philippe escreveu: > > I have understood that widget stuff is not a priority anymore, but I > > believe that class would be important to add. That's maybe the only > > thing I am missing in the classical widget classes. > > You misunderstand. It's not that widgets aren't a priority. > > Widgets are "Done", meaning no new features. We will not add > QAnchorLayout, no matter how much you ask.
Thiago, I think you should at least consider offering Maintainership for
Widgets. There are a LOT of people who fervently believe that Widgets are
very much alive and can still be improved.
If no one steps up, that is another matter.
Konrad
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
