On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:13 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> Doing high performance IPC has so far required a roll-your-own >> approach [...] >> Perhaps Qt could provide such a thing as a module? > > Why would it? What's wrong with using the non qt solutions out there?
Well, Qt (in the extended sense of the word) already provides Service Framework. It also provides "blessed" DBUS binding. So such things are not entirely out of scope. My preferred approach would be to rewrite Service Framework to use a low latency solution. This was suggested before and shot down, but that transpired before feb 11 and open governance so some things may be different now. > Also i know at least 5 solutions _with_ Qt, existing built from the community. > Maybe it makes more sense to raise awareness for such community projects. Agreed. I'm not particularly interested in bloating Qt - but pointing at a fast way to do IPC as a "Qt endorsed" solution might be a good idea. _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
