Den 01. sep. 2011 14:09, skrev ext [email protected]: > Hi Thiago, > > I disagree to some extent, see below. > > On 9/1/11 1:43 PM, "ext Thiago Macieira"<[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thursday, 1 de September de 2011 13:10:30 Thiago Macieira wrote: >>> If I correct src.pro line 11 to the proper conditional (instead of the >>> double negative), configure finishes without error. I'll let you know >>> if >>> this compiles. >> Ok, it compiled with -no-gui -no-v8 on IA-64 and it compiled with -no-v8 >> on >> MIPS. >> >> So the -no-v8 option seems to work for QtBase. >> >> My suggested course of action is therefore: >> >> 1) immediately fix src.pro line 11 > Yes, that's a plain old bug...
The fix is in staging now. Additionally, the architecture detection in v8.pri is still a bit flaky because QT_ARCH isn't set correctly when v8.pro is evaluated from within src.pro -- see https://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-21224. >> 2) add a configure-time check for enabling or disabling V8. >> 3) withhold any and all mandatory uses of V8 inside Qt Base. The module >> must >> compile with the same API until further decision. > We'll work on getting the ARM simulator that built into V8 working on all > platforms. That should resolve the feature parity problem, but performance > might not be the best everywhere. Yup. Kent _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
