>From: Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 3:22 AM >Subject: Re: [Qt5-feedback] Release configurations and API stability (Was: Re: >Moving examples to a separate module) > >On Thursday, 15 de September de 2011 21.08.51, [email protected] wrote: >> >For sake of a comparison, kind of like with Windows - if you get the >> >Windows 7 Business Edition then you don't get the Multimedia stuff that >> >is in Windows 7 Home Premium, things you might need though for >> >presentations. >> >> Don't want this. Just have a look at the Qt product definition (see some >> earlier thread on this list). We have Qt essentials that have to be there >> on all platforms, and addons that are optional or only supported on >> certain platforms. That should make this a lot clearer than with Qt 4. > >"All the features" are defined by the Qt release, which is done by the Qt >community. The Qt community and project are the only ones entitled to >attributing a new version number. > >Anything else is a "vendor branch". Vendors are allowed to apply patches if >they need them. They may not add or remove features, break binary >compatibility or invent a new version number. >
Thanks that is very good to know. Ben _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
