On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Uwe Rathmann <[email protected]>wrote:
> Again: this is no positive or negative statement about QML. All I want to > say is that every type of application I was working on has its own very > special weird requirements, that take the majority of my development > time. That's why I would always decide to use the API that helps me best > to do these things. > There will be always weird requirements. QML doesn't block you from implementing these specific components, since you can always fallback to C++ to create a spectrogram or whatever you need. And yes, QML can scale for huge applications if you use it right. I've been working in some pretty big projects, for desktop and mobile, during the last years and I didn't reach any blocker issue. Even though QML still need some refinements and maturation, it's far better than the old imperative way of doing things. Br, Adriano
_______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
