On Sunday, 25 de September de 2011 01:48:33 Иван Комиссаров wrote: > As long as QFileEngines are marked as deprecated, Qt will have no > possibility to implement virtual filesystem. > > So i would like to discuss features of new VFS. > > I have 2 questions. First - should it work using QFile and QDir classes as > front-end or it should provide its own API like QVFSFile? Second - if we > provide new API, should it be synchronous (like QFile) or asynchronous > (like Q*Socket)?
I would prefer a new API, more suited for the task. Whether it is synchronous
or asynchronous, it's up to the implementation.
Experience in KDE shows asynchronous is better when a non-negligible delay is
expected.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
