On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 06:18:31PM +0200, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Monday, 26 de September de 2011 18:06:40 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > one could solve the fragile base class problem within qt scope. > > > What are you proposing? > as i said, i'm so far only thinking aloud.
the relevant paper which underlies the gjc implementation is here: http://www.usenix.org/event/jvm02/yu/yu_html/index.html here is an entirely different approach: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2000-12/msg00581.html i've been pondering this myself, and i think it would be doable. the problem is that it would produce executables which are *stuffed* with relocations, so it would be kind of the antithesis of generating PIC code. it would mandate prelinking, and it would conflict with the IA64 ABI (for which i still don't know why it requires relocation-free shared objects). _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
