On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 08:52:54 ext Michael Hasselmann wrote: > Hi, > > as graphics view is on its way out, with Qt Quick 2, I was wondering why > QML still keeps (then-to-be) historical link to it, through its QGS > prefix for its base classes. > > I mean, isn't also one of the Qt API guidelines to avoid abbreviations > where possible? I personally think that QSceneItem would for example be > a better fit than QSGItem (same for QSGPaintedItem).
This was brought up last week on this very list. Not that it can't be discussed further, but Aaron has already answered your question. On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:49:45 ext [email protected] wrote: > Hi, > > On 28/09/2011, at 3:46 AM, ext Adriano Rezende wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I didn't have time to play with QtQuick2 yet, but looking at the code > > I think there are some points that should be reconsidered. > > > > 1. Naming conventions > > > > QtQuick2 items adopts an abbreviation 'SG' to prefix their class > > names, like QSGItem. Since SG is not a well know acronym, wouldn't be > > better to have a more descriptive name without abbreviating? Like, > > QQuickItem, QSceneItem or even QSceneGraphItem? > > "SG" is a placeholder. The plan is to rename QSGItem to QQuickItem. -- Alan Alpert Senior Engineer Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
