On Monday 10 October 2011 11:52:37 Mark wrote: > Hi, > > Some time ago I've read something here about replacing Qt't QRegExp backend > with a existing library to get rid of the maintenance burden.
One other conclusion was not to touch QRegExp, meaning keeping compatibility. And those that need powerfull regexp can use the library and syntax they want. (Notice that in C++11, there is std::regex) _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
