On Sunday, 16 de October de 2011 17:12:33 Olivier Goffart wrote: > > One big difference between QList and QVector today is that QList has > > prepend / takeFirst optimisation, whereas QVector must move all elements > > to accommodate. I would prefer if that optimisation remained present. > It has to (it enable QList to be used for queue like data structure (and it > is, see QQueue) > > QList was also supposed to expands to less code (than QVector) (at least > that is what Jasmin used to advertise some years ago)
I don't see how it can expand to less code than a simple vector. The best case
scenario is to expand to the same code or to similar complexity -- assuming of
course that QVector is optimised to produce minimal code too.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
