On Monday 17 October 2011 10:58:04 ext Robin Burchell wrote: > hi, > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:46 AM, André Pönitz <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Re "QList-and-QVector" merge: I'd really like to see reference counting > > _removed_ from QVector. We do need _one_ easy-to-use-no-overhead > > container. That probably make that merge harder.... > > isn't QVarLengthArray what you're after?
Except for the ugly name, a few missing convenience functions like 'indexOf', and the second template argument, sure ;-} But QVector without implicit sharing would fit the same bill. Given that QVector and QList cover the same ground in a lot of cases and QVector is not heavily used in Qt API (compared to QList) tweaking QVector seems to be the better choice from my perspective. Andre' _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
