Rohan McGovern <rohan.mcgovern <at> nokia.com> writes:

> Hi Holger,

Hi Rohan,



> With respect to specific tools, Jenkins has a bit of traction, because
> it is similar to the non-free tool we are currently using (Pulse)
> and it is also coincidentally being used in a few places within Nokia
> already.

I understand that in the beginning infrastructure will be solely operated
by Nokia, would it make sense to setup a Jenkins outside of Nokia? Is there
a list of what Pulse/Scripts do that Jenkins is not capable of doing right
now? I assume the Qt Project starts off while still using your internal
and non-free pulse system while an alternative is built?



> If they are generic enough to be usable for e.g. "any" DirectFB backend,
> then it may be appropriate to check them into the source tree, if they
> are fairly stable.  If they're likely to be unstable, or they are very
> large, we don't have any good solution at the moment :(

The question is a general one. How do we have custom results? In this
specific case the DirectFB software image decoders generate different
results to Qt, but if I would build a SoC platform and I decide to run
Qt tests and my hardware is giving a slightly different result i would
want to override some results? Any idea?

In case of image results it would make sense to look for 'foo.png'
in images/foo.png, images/QPA-DirectFB/foo.png,
images/QPA-DirectFB/HW/foo.png, maybe even have qrc:/ look into an
external path?




_______________________________________________
Qt5-feedback mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback

Reply via email to