Ok, this functionality is need for most medium and big applications - better reason?))
Other variants - not to include at all (fooooo), create separate module (whole library for 500 lines of code - fooo), link to kcore (is it really better than +10kb to QtCore?) 21.10.2011, в 21:37, [email protected] написал(а): > The question is never "why not have something in core", it's "why does this > need to be in core". Being small in size is not a very good reason... > > On 21/10/2011 20:12 Иван Комиссаров wrote: > > CMD line parser is very small utility, not more than 500-1000 lines of code > (even with feature of type-checking), so why not to include it into Core? > As far as i remember, kde implementation doesn't have some features (i > compared some tools when i need some parser; boost parser was best option for > me; however it has awful syntax and doesn't integrate with Qt types and > QVariant, so i had to reinvent wheel:( ) > > 21.10.2011, в 21:03, Andre Somers написал(а): > > > Op 21-10-2011 16:29, Stefan Majewsky schreef: > >> Moin moin, > >> > >> it would be nice to have a command line parser in QtCore, i.e. some > >> class that parses stuff like > >> > >>> ./program -vh --long-option --value=5 foo.dat > >> given some format definition. KCmdLineArgs and KCmdLineOptions from > >> kdecore do exactly that for KDE programs. I don't have time right now, > >> but perhaps someone wants to pick up this task? > >> > > Does it need to be in core? Would an add-on module that only depends on > > QtCore not be just as useful? > > > > André _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
_______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
