On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:58:33AM -0600, Sean Vig wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Tycho Andersen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Oh, shit, it was? Is eb519eacda710a4012fbcbf494956aa017cc036d related? > > Just want to make sure I didn't break anything. > > > > That was exactly it. It was more the fault of xcb switching from packing > with lists to packing with switches, and changing the type from unsigned to > signed. I guess xcffib 0.5 would have been fine with xcb-proto 1.11, but > with 0.5 and 1.12, the hacks in the old qtile release would break it.
Ok, makes sense. Then we can blame the xcb-proto guys :). Although technically it sounds like it was a "fix", so perhaps we can thank them for fixing a 20 year old bug. Anyway, thanks! Tycho > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "qtile-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qtile-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
