The following position, taken from a "Toronto player full-game report" illustrates three problems with an otherwise very useful feature.
> A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O John Chew AAEIORT 219 > ------------------------------ -> Tony Leah DEINRSV 183 > 1|= ' = ' B =| --Toronto Player's choices (your play: > 2)---- > 2| - " " F A - | best F12 V(EX) 13 38.31% DEINRS > 3| - ' ' L I | 1.84*12F V 13 37.04% DEINRS > 4|' - ' H O T '| 6.09 E8 DRIVE(N) 25 33.92% NS > 5| - A W E | 8.26 N1 END 28 33.50% IRSV > 6| " " " P E D " | 8.14 F12 D(EX) 11 33.00% EINRSV > 7| ' ' D R ' | 8.99 J2 VIS 21 32.20% DENR > 8|= ' L E A K Y =| 12.8 2L (FA)VE 20 32.19% DINRS > 9| ' ' C I ' | 9.16 N1 ENDS 37 32.13% IRV > 10| V " U " N " | 9.74 11A V(I)D 7 32.08% EINRS > 11| I - R G | 17.2 xch V 0 27.90% DEINRS > 12|' T F Q I S - '| > --Tracking----------------------------------- > 13| A T O N E D O - | ??AAAAACEEEEEEGGHIIJLLMNNOOOOPRRRSTTTUUUWYZ > 43 > 14| E B X I N " - | > 15|= ' M I S O ' =| > ------------------------------ 1. AAEIORT is not my rack. The opponent racks appear to be bogus throughout. 2. The top two choices are the same play, except that the second one is arguably a phoney. 3. You can't actually see this, but it would be useful if there were a way to enter scoring errors, especially where they might affect winning percentages. Even as I enter this, I realise that I could have just edited the .gcg file. I'll go try that out, and if that works, withdraw this complaint. John -- John Chew (poslfit on MD) * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.poslfit.com
