AFAICT from the source code, the leaves are not encoded in tree form, but instead simply as (leave, value) pairs stored sequentially, right?
-AC * John O'Laughlin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070323 15:41]: > > Rick, > > > > In November I changed the way Quackle's leave values are created and I > have generated values for TWL06, CSW, and French. Sometime when I get > a chance I will post a link to a human-readable list of Quackle's > leave values, but comparing OSWI to CSW is less valuable without a > list of OSWI values created by the same process. It is rather time > consuming to create these values, and so I'm not sure if or when I'll > want to make them for TWL98 or OSWI.
