Jason--

        Thx for the explanation!  Good luck with the new version--I'll be 
looking for it in March.

Stu
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jason Katz-Brown 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 5:07 PM
  Subject: Re: [quackle] 2 problems with Quackle in 1 day


  On Jan 24, 2008 5:01 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  > As I previously reported, I play with the 20-second version when I
  > get up in the morning. This AM. I was down by about 75 points with about 25
  > unseen tiles,and had a junk rack--the Q (with no places to play it) and
  > only1 vowel, an E. I didn't like any of the plays suggested, so I clicked
  > on "ask Championship Player". The best choice there waa to exchange 5
  > tiles, keeping ER. When I did that my new rack contained the Q! This had
  > never happened before when I tossed the Q. I aborted the game immediately
  > since it no longer bore any relationship to reality.

  That's weird, I'll look out for such an anamoly.

  >
  > Later, playing with Championship Player, I was comfortably ahead and
  > had the rack AAEORTT, while Player 2 had 5 consonants including the P and H.
  > I had a play picked out and looked for it among the choices, but it was not
  > there. I asked Championship Player, and it gave a play of 2 vowels, with a
  > winning % of 0! I went back to the list of choices and typed in my play
  > (T(E)AT, with 2 places to go out with AERO) which blocked a place for
  > Quackle to gert a DWS with the P and H plus one other consonant. This
  > scored a 100% win, along with most of the other choices. I played it, and
  > Quackle played PHT for 47 points elsewhere.
  >

  It's a bug in the current Quackle version that Championship Player
  always returns 0% winning percentage in the endgame, regardless of
  whether a play wins or loses :-/

  Thanks,
  Jason

  > I should mention that I play with the Collins 07 lexicon. I also
  > tried to look up that second game's board, but when I clicked on History
  > nothing happened.
  >
  > Stu Goldman 


   

Reply via email to