Under what circumstances does Quackle consider a non-random opponent's rack?
If I play a game against Q and select a move for evaluation by say, Championship Player, is the opponent's rack presumed to include the leave from the previous play plus some random draw? Sometimes I use the test harness to analyze an entire .gcg. For some games I have only partial knowledge of opponents' racks--Maybe the .gcg contains information about a won challenge, but most of the time I only know what tiles were played. Does Q take into account the small amount of knowledge available by including the known tiles when doing the sim? Sometimes I simulate games where the .gcg is a complete record--does this skew the simulation results relative to an over-the-board game because the simulation takes into account leaves of which I have no knowledge? --gvc
