Re: [QUAD-L] Re: Ralph Nader supported by GOP

[Tony Starez]

...i like choices, but if the lefties have two candidates, it splits the votes...the religious right only have one!!  And then there's ME...here for the quad vote, i'll take paras too smurf n stacy ; )   -tony ----- Original Message ----- From: Jim Lubin To: River Wolfe ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 2:12 PM Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Re: Ralph Nader supported by GOP Why should it be illegal or unethical to pay people so that a candidates name is on the ballot? That's all they are doing. They are not paying people to vote for Nader. Are the Democrats worried that Kerry can't win the liberal vote if people have a choice between Kerry or Nader? I would never vote for Nader but support his right to run for president. Isn't the election about people being given a choice? Why did the Green Party not endorse the strongest candidate they had?  Why are the Democrats trying so hard to keep Nader off the ballot? It's not like Bush and Kerry are the only names on the ballot. What's wrong with giving people another choice? Jim At 08:46 AM 8/5/2004, River Wolfe wrote: It may be legal, but it sure is unethical!!!!!  I used to respect Nader. River Is that legal? "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Here where I live the Republicans are supporting the petition signing for Ralph Nader, he needs so many signatures to be on the ballot but the the weird thing is that they (GOP) are paying people 75 cents to a dollar for each signature to get Nader on the ballot!! Desperation! Meredith </blockquote></x-html> ---- Jim Lubin               [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bothell, WA, USA      http://makoa.org/jim disAbility Resources: http://www.makoa.org Transverse Myelitis Association: http://www.myelitis.org/HowToHelp