|
Who said I was voting for Bush?
There is another candidate that you might want to listen to tonight
on David Letterman show.
Mark
-------Original
Message-------
Date: Thursday,
October 14, 2004 3:29:38 PM
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L]
Political Garbage, & False Logic .... Reaction to: Communist Party
Endorsement Kerry/Edwards
You said you weren't voting for Kerry. I was curious to know why
you are voting for Bush. I'm not judging , but it interests me why the
people who have not decided do decide on one candidate or the
other.
Stacy
"People who hate you do not win unless you hate them. Then you
destroy yourself"
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004
12:03 PM
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Political
Garbage, & False Logic .... Reaction to: Communist Party
Endorsement Kerry/Edwards
|
Bush's side of what?
Mark
-------Original
Message-------
Date:
Wednesday, October 13, 2004 11:40:33 PM
Subject: Re:
[QUAD-L] Political Garbage, & False Logic .... Reaction to:
Communist Party Endorsement Kerry/Edwards
Mark,
I'm curious to know what made you swing over to Bush's
side.
Stacy
"People who hate you do not win unless you hate them. Then
you destroy yourself"
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, October
13, 2004 8:51 PM
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L]
Political Garbage, & False Logic .... Reaction to:
Communist Party Endorsement Kerry/Edwards
There are many problems with embryonic stem
cells including tumors and cellular rejection that are no
problem when using ones own adult stem cells. Therefore
the justification for spending money on research for the
one with more known problems instead of the one with fewer
problems has a logic problem behind it. This is above
and beyond the ethics involved. Kerry is using this as a
campaign issue even though it shouldn't be. He is promising
the moon. Doesn't mean a thing. Stuntman
>
> > Stuntman Bush has banned Federal money on
The majority of stem cells I never > said there was
a ban on research. > My problem is his way of
thinking. > For example, did you know more embryos are
lost by a natural pregnancy than > in vitro
fertilization? > In vitro fertilization has a better
success rate than natural conception so > should we
ban natural conception because it's killing more embryos
than ivf? > > This position he has is not
scientific it's personal so I think I would let >
the scientist be the judge instead of Bush and that's not Junk
science that > s responsible science. >
> I could care less what Kerry thinks about this
subject this is my opinion > and I'm not voting for
Kerry btw. > > Mark > >
-------Original Message------- > > From:
Stuntman > Date: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 9:53:31
PM > To: QuadPirate; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Political Garbage, & False Logic .
Reaction to: > Communist Party Endorsement
Kerry/Edwards > > There is no ban on
embryonic stem research. > There is no scientific proof
at this time that it works better than > adult stem
cells. > Do you want real science funded or "junk
science". > KERRY IS LYING! >
|
|