anything is better than the current administration.
i'mworried that a right wing bible thumping idiot like
w is going to think that he will hasten the second comming
by starting millatary action where and when he feels it's
needed tocause the "end time". if he's this rightwing now
just imagine what he's going to be like when he doesn't
have to worry about re-election.
all he wants is a christan theocracy

dave headman
c4 25yrs post

From: "Billy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jim Lubin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] FW: A washingtonpost.com article
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:40:16 -0400

Jim,
A very good article. These guys are selling inuendo, and a promise to do a 'better' job than the current administration. Absent of any details on any of the promises (even if one is inclined to put their faith in the snake oil sales), one must rely on their past to give some indication of their ability to be honest and trustworthy.


I offer the following - everyone should be informed as possible.

http://kerrylied.com/otherdocs/flash.htm

Don't let what you cannot do interfere with what you can do!

Billy
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Jim Lubin
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 3:14 PM
  Subject: [QUAD-L] FW: A washingtonpost.com article



   An Edwards Outrage

   By Charles Krauthammer

     After the second presidential debate, in which John Kerry used the
  word "plan" 24 times, I said on television that Kerry has a plan for
  everything except curing psoriasis. I should have known there is no
  parodying Kerry's pandering. It turned out days later that the Kerry
  campaign has a plan -- nay, a promise --  to cure paralysis. What is the
  plan? Vote for Kerry.

    This is John Edwards on Monday at a rally in Newton, Iowa: "If we do
  the work that we can do in this country, the work that we will do when
  John Kerry is president, people like Christopher Reeve are going to
  walk, get up out of that wheelchair and walk again."

    In my 25 years in Washington, I have never seen a more loathsome
  display of demagoguery. Hope is good. False hope is bad. Deliberately,
  for personal gain, raising false hope in the catastrophically afflicted
  is despicable.

    Where does one begin to deconstruct this outrage?

    First, the inability of the human spinal cord to regenerate is one of
  the great mysteries of biology. The answer is not remotely around the
  corner. It could take a generation to unravel. To imply, as Edwards did,
  that it is imminent if only you elect the right politicians is
  scandalous.

    Second, if the cure for spinal cord injury comes, we have no idea
  where it will come from. There are many lines of inquiry. Stem cell
  research is just one of many possibilities, and a very speculative one
  at that. For 30 years I have heard promises of miracle cures for
  paralysis (including my own, suffered as a medical student). The last
  fad, fetal tissue transplants, was thought to be a sure thing. Nothing
  came of it.

    As a doctor by training, I've known better than to believe the hype --
  and have tried in my own counseling of  people with new spinal cord
  injuries to place the possibility of cure in abeyance. I advise instead
  to concentrate on making a life (and a very good life it can be) with
  the hand one is dealt. The greatest enemies of this advice have been the
  snake-oil salesmen promising a miracle around the corner. I never
  expected a candidate for vice president to be one of them.

    Third, the implication that Christopher Reeve was prevented from
  getting out of his wheelchair by the Bush stem cell policies is a
  travesty.

   George Bush is the first president to approve federal funding for stem
  cell research. There are 22 lines of stem cells now available, up from
  one just two years ago. As Leon Kass, head of the President's Council on
  Bioethics, has written, there are 3,500 shipments of stem cells waiting
  for anybody who wants them.

    Edwards and Kerry constantly talk of a Bush "ban" on stem cell
  research. This is false. There is no ban. You want to study stem cells?
  You get them from the companies that have the cells and apply to the
  National Institutes of Health for the federal funding.

    In his Aug. 7 radio address to the nation, Kerry referred not once but
  four times to the "ban" on stem cell research instituted by Bush. At the
  time, Reeve was alive, so not available for posthumous exploitation. But
  Ronald Reagan was available, having recently died of Alzheimer's.

    So what does Kerry do? He begins his radio address with the
  disgraceful claim that the stem cell "ban" is standing in the way of an
  Alzheimer's cure.

    This is an outright lie. The President's Council on Bioethics, on
  which I sit, had one of the world's foremost experts on Alzheimer's,
  Dennis Selkoe from Harvard, give us a lecture on the newest and most
  promising approaches to solving the Alzheimer's mystery. Selkoe reported
  remarkable progress in using biochemicals to clear the "plaque" deposits
  in the brain that lead to Alzheimer's. He ended his presentation without
  the phrase "stem cells" having passed his lips.

    So much for the miracle cure. Ronald D.G. McKay, a stem cell
  researcher at NIH, has admitted publicly that stem cells as an
  Alzheimer's cure are a fiction, but that "people need a fairy tale."
  Kerry and Edwards certainly do. They are shamelessly exploiting this
  fairy tale, having no doubt been told by their pollsters that stem cells
  play well politically for them.

    Politicians have long promised a chicken in every pot. It is part of
  the game. It is one thing to promise ethanol subsidies here, dairy price
  controls there. But to exploit the desperate hopes of desperate people
  with the promise of Christ-like cures is beyond the pale.

    There is no apologizing for Edwards's remark. It is too revealing.
  There is absolutely nothing the man will not say to get elected.

   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



   Would you like to send this article to a friend? Go to
  http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/admin/emailfriend?contentId=A34
  167-2004Oct14&sent=no&referrer=emailarticle



  Visit washingtonpost.com today for the latest in:

  News - http://www.washingtonpost.com/?referrer=emailarticle

  Politics -
  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/politics/?referrer=emailarticle

  Sports -
  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/sports/?referrer=emailarticle

  Entertainment -
  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/artsandliving/entertainmentguide/?r
  eferrer=emailarticle

  Travel -
  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/travel/?referrer=emailarticle

  Technology -
  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/technology/?referrer=emailarticle




Want the latest news in your inbox? Check out washingtonpost.com's e-mail newsletters:

  http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?node=admin/email&referrer=email
  article



  � 2004 The Washington Post Company










_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar � get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/




Reply via email to