Minneapolis ABC affiliate KSTP-TV, which had a crew embedded with the 101st Airborne Division during the war, released videotape that it said showed soldiers examining explosives at the massive Al-Qaqaa facility nine days after the fall of Baghdad. The video could possibly undermine Bush's suggestion the explosives were looted before the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.
Mark
-------Original Message-------
Date: Thursday, October 28, 2004 16:37:52
Subject: RE: [QUAD-L] Who's the Enemy?
>It's the fact that our president has no clue what happened to these
explosives that bugs me and why didn't "we" break these seals and "see"
for ourselves since we were in control?<
I guess you missed the earlier post where the first group of our
soldiers who entered the area said that "NO IAE TAGS WERE PRESENT"!
Gone already. No story get it?
> I could care less when it was brought up because you can bet your ass
Bush
> would've never brought it up and that is obvious!
Why would he bother to bring up something that may have been removed
BEFORE the ground work began? Why is it the same people who claimed
Sadamned couldn't hide 10LBs of WMD no claim that 380 Tons of high
explosives disappeared right under our noses?
You getting it yet?
BTW
"International Atomic Energy Agency documents ... indicate the amount
of missing explosives may be substantially less than the Iraqis
reported. ...on Jan. 14, 2003, the agency's inspectors recorded that
just over three tons of RDX were stored at the facility � a
considerable discrepancy from what the Iraqis reported."
http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=204304&page=1
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20041028-122637-6257r.htm
You still don't seem to get it.
> I actually like the lighter note but didn't read where the promise
was to lose the war on terror.
>
"With the same energy...I put into going after the Viet Cong and trying
to win for our country,<
Umm after filing false reports to get 2 out of the 3 purple hearts (no
enemy fire when he accidently wounded himself with a grenade launcher
during a night time training exercise, no enemy fire when he got rice
embedded in his butt after "he" droped a grenade into a rice storage in
a village while doing patrol aand didn't run fast enough).
He was the ONLY Swift boat commander to take an early leave out of
Vietnam before completing a full tour. Sounds like he was "really"
motivated to going after the Viet Cong.
NOT!
> "I pledge to you I will hunt down and capture or kill the terrorists
> before they harm us. And we will wage a war on terror that makes
> America proud and brings the world to our side."
Is that the same kind of pledge he violated after returning from
Vietnam?
The one where he swore to uphold the Constitution,
which clearly expresses the seriousness of an Officer giving "aid and
comfort to the enemy"
which he violated TWICE meeting with the enemy in Paris (he was still
an officer in the reserves)
AND either lying to everyone (the Congessional Committee, the press,
and on Dick Cavitt) that "he also committed attrocities in Vietnam"
OR the fact he failed to report witnessing same to his superiors which
is another violation, making him guilty of a war crime,
and waiting to publicaly make a spectical in front of the world.
(causing our POW's to suffer in the process)
Do I need to continue?
Do you now understand that IF he fights Terrorism in the same manner
that he "fought VC", he WILL lose.
Stuntman
--
It's not the fall that hurts.
Home page http://tnthompson0.tripod.com/homeincyberspace/
Graphics portfolio http://tnthompson1.tripod.com/index.htm
Domain space http://nw-in.com/index.html
. | 
IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
