|
News flash Bin Laden is still planning new attacks and is giving orders to his terrorist group Al-Qeada and is trying to get nuclear and chemical weapons.
The fact that he planned and executed the TWC is proof to how dangerous this terrorist is and we should use every resource available to capture him at any cost.
We have a 25 million dollar price on his head and haven't caught him yet so that should tell you how strong he is in his organization.
You do know that he is actually planning to do us great harm and the last time we didn't pay attention look what happened.
We're not near as safe as the president would like you to believe. Did you know in Texas there's a thousand people a night crossing the border illegally?
That's not counting New Mexico or Arizona!
Does that sound safe to you?
Al Zarqawi wasn't a terrorist until we went into Iraq btw so if we would've used our resources to get Bin Laden instead of Saddam then Al-Zarqawi wouldn't have ever been a threat and wouldn't have teamed up with Al-Qeada to make an even bigger terrorist group with no more on their mind than kill Americans.
It sure seams like this administration made the terrorist more united.
Is killing Al-Zarqawi going to stop terrorism? No. So why should he be top priority?
Osama should be top priority because he's already killed over 2000 innocent Americans on our soil and is planning it again.
I can't believe you think he's incapable of executing another major attack.
Mark
-------Original Message-------
Date: Thursday, November 04, 2004 15:23:55
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Who's the President?
Special forces and CIA are hunting Bin Laden. Using more people to track him down would, to me at least, be a waste of resources which could be used to stop those who are actually going to do us harm. No, I don't belive capturing Bin Laden for past planing of the WTC is not a top priority in terrorism. Top priority is to stop those who are planing to harm us in the future before it happens.
Is terrorism going to stop when we get Bin Laden. No. So why should it be a top priority? Killing Abu Musab al-Zarqawi should be our top priority.
Jim
At 12:45 PM 11/4/2004, QuadPirate wrote:
I believe Saddam wasn't actually carrying out attacks either he was their leader just like Bin Laden only Bin Laden planned TWC.
I can't believe I'm reading this.
Tell that to the people of NY I bet they have a very different opinion.
Are you saying he's not our top priority in terrorism?
That's like saying our President is just a figure head!
When we get Bin Laden this country will have a party like no other and for that time we'll be one America and then Bush will have done his Job.
It's crazy to think this country can take our time to get Bin Laden.
Mark
-------Original Message-------
From: Jim Lubin
Date: Thursday, November 04, 2004 14:14:21
To: QuadPirate; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Stuntman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Who's the President?
He's just a figure head. He is not personally carrying out any attacks. When we catch Bin Laden all terrorism is not going to end. That's why I say we'll catch him when we catch him. Efforts should be focused on the people actually plaining to carry out attacks and the support networks behind them.
At 11:48 AM 11/4/2004, QuadPirate wrote:
You know Jim Bin Laden took 8 years before he attacked the WTC again so every day he's still out there is a threat to us.
So there's no time to say we'll get him when we get him we need to get him before he strikes again.
The thought that we have plenty of time is like a time bomb waiting to explode.
We need him now not later!
How can anyone argue with that?
Mark
____________________________________________________
 IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
----
Jim Lubin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bothell, WA, USA
http://makoa.org/jim
disAbility Resources: http://www.makoa.org
Transverse Myelitis Association: http://www.myelitis.org/HowToHelp
| 
IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
