|
Are you kidding me!
This man made John McCain look just like Kerry and these are 2 war Heros that have the medals to prove it.
Where's Bush's Medals?
He knew just like many son's of powerful men he wasn't going near Viet Nam and anyone that thinks different is pure dilusional.
So his character and Values attacked his Republican running mate McCain who spent 5 1/2 years in a P.O.W. camp who went back to Viet Nam with Kerry Btw to make damn sure there were none still there.
Having absolutely no combat experience and showing his lack of leadership of war by not being hands on with the war plan and told Pat Robertson when he was planning invasion of Iraq pat asked about the casualties and his answer according to Pat was "What Casualties" does that sound like an honest answer or plain arrogance!
I can't believe how lost people are on his character and values and it's true you know where he stands and that's the whole problem. You think Osama is upset about Iraq? This is his first xmas he couldn't be happier! Or still free because of it!
You want to show Character then bring me and the rest of this country an early xmas present, Osama's head in neatly wrapped box then I'll be happy and then he will have kept his word.
Mark
-------Original Message-------
Date: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 12:42:06
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Suggestion (politics)
Regarding River's suggested sites ...
Everyone and anyone ... always consider THE SOURCE of your info and facts. A quick glimpse at the htp address is a start. The LIBERAL media and FACTS is an oxymoron. Like military intelligence :-)
Other than the sensationalism and half truths and inuendo that the liberal media sites try to twist the story into something it isn't. You have to look deeper than these sites. Look at their reference sites. The Honest references that DO NOT HAVE AN AGENDA present the story quite matter of factly and as clearly something Bush should (and did) have approved.
Don't take it all that seriously. I have found that people that lean towards the Democrats hate Bush, while those that lean towards the Republicans feel the other way. NEITHER group of people seems really interested in truth, but only in listening to those things (true or not) that support their point of view. This is exactly what makes discussions in politics so dangerous to the non-intellectual or non-thinker.
I guess the bottom line is, after Slick Willie and the democratic dirty tricks machine, can this country really stand to have a Clinton clone like Kerry in the white house?
I know Bush is no cup of tea or walk in the park, but when it comes to character, he is head and shoulders above anyone else running. Right now, the US needs to present a strong face to the world, if for no other reason than to scare the terrorists. Bush does that, Kerry is a joke! Kerry's only claim to fame is that he had his press secretary filming him coming out of the jungle and that he will be able to bring his girlfriend back from Europe as soon as the election is over. We really don't need anymore of that type of person at the top.
I have heard alot of things said about Bush by the democrats in order to deflect and misinform the public, but I have heard NO ONE, repeat NO ONE, successfully attack his honesty and character. Moore is a joke and a fool. Even his supporters laugh at him. Bush may be wrong (or, at least, I do not agree with him) about some things, hell, who isn't, but he doesn't change his mind simply to please the particular crowd he is speaking to.
Politics is just that... politics.
-------Original Message-------
Date: 11/10/04 09:27:06
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Suggestion (politics)
W,
I see you're a bit uninformed...
Check out these FACTS:
votersunite.org
> blackboxvoting.org
>
dailykos.com
eop.blogspot.com
> Sometimes there where more votes than voters (Keith's blog: Cuyahoga
> County,
> Ohio. In 29 precincts there, the County's website shows, we had the
> most
> unexpected results in years: more votes than voters.)
>
> Sometimes the votes skewed wildly against the known party affiliation.
> (Keith's blog: 29 of those Florida counties had large Democratic
> majorities
> among registered voters but produced landslides for President Bush. )
>
> Sometimes the machines simply screwed up -- the instances where these
> problems were caught and fixed are how we know this.
>
> The Los Angeles Times today mentioned some of the problems, and
> alluded to
> the growing blogosphere that will not let this story go.
>
> If you want to know the facts behind all this, and why Keith
> vigorously
> pursues it, read his blog, and watch Countdown all this week.
>
> As for that L.A. Times piece, here's a chunk.
> "David Dill, a Stanford University computer expert, said that based on
> reports that Dill's organization - Verified Voting.org - has
> received, one
> precinct in Youngstown, Ohio, recorded a negative 25 million votes,
> which
> was discarded from official results. And it was widely reported after
> Nov. 2
> that a North Carolina precinct lost 4,000 votes when a recording
> device used
> up all its memory but voters continued to cast ballots on the
> machine."
> ohio9nov09,1,6497338.story?c
> oll=la-news-elect2004
>
> Keith blogs:
> "Representative John Conyers of Michigan... now leads a small but
> growing
> group of Democratic congressmen who've written the General
> Accountability
> Office demanding an investigation of what we should gently call the
> Electronic Voting Angst. Conyers insisted he wasn't trying to re-cast
> the
> election, but seemed mystified that in the 21st Century we could have
> advanced to a technological state in which voting- fine, flawed, or
> felonious- should leave no paper trail. ... By actual rough count,
> between
> the 8 p.m. ET start of the program and 10:30 p.m. ET last night, we
> received
> 1,570 e-mails (none of them duplicates or forms, as near as I can
> tell).
> 1,508 were positive, 62 negative." Read the whole blog...
| 
