three months after the passage of texas's tort law,  doctors rates were increased by 18% by the largest med.mal insurance company in texas.  And..
 
The AMA and the insurance lobby only will report what they want folks to know, thus as i said dig deeper than what the bias media doles.
  There is also a 'smoking gun' document Im too tired to retreive right now, as the texas medical mal insurance company admitted it will do not good. as is  mentioned in that link..
 
I thought I had the gusto to respond...today..but I need a nap :)   I'll get back to q-l in a bit :)
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] cnbc's poll today

Hi Sherry,
 
On Sept. 13, 2003, the people of Texas, approved Proposition 12, granting the Texas Legislature the authority to cap noneconomic damages in health care liability cases and ensuring doctors and hospitals will be there when they are sick or injured.
 

"The real winners of this election are the people of Texas who can be more certain that doctor will be there for them when they�re sick or injured.

"The physicians of Texas and our patients owe a debt of gratitude to the Republican and Democratic legislators who recognized the serious threat to health care in Texas, and passed the legislation enabling today's vote. We also thank Governor and Mrs. Perry for their tireless campaiging on the issue.

"I can't end the thanks without pointing out how hard our doctors, their spouses, and others in the medical community worked to keep the debate focused on the true issue -- access to care."

http://www.texmed.org/prop12/default.asp

Passage of House Bill 4 and Proposition 12, which limit non-economic damages to $250,000 in medical malpractice lawsuits, has already had a positive impact on the Texas medical malpractice market. Since September 2003, actions have been taken on a number of fronts that demonstrate the positive impact of Proposition 12."

http://www.tdi.state.tx.us/commish/talkmedical.html#developments

"All across Texas there are signs that passage of Proposition 12 and House Bill 4 are delivering on the promise of healing our health-care delivery system. Just six months have passed since Texans passed Prop. 12, and early indications offered in testimony recently before the House Civil Practices Committee are remarkably positive. The goal of increasing access to health care is being realized.

Both Prop. 12 and its underlying legislation, HB4, were designed to avert a growing crisis in the Texas health-care system. Too many lawsuits against health-care providers were driving up the cost of practicing medicine, resulting in reduced access to health care. Last year, only four medical liability insurers remained in Texas after 13 insurers fled a state they claimed was too litigious. Many higher risk medical specialists, such as neurosurgeons and obstetricians, were leaving Texas or simply ending their practices here because of the high cost of malpractice insurance. In short, too many Texans were at risk of losing access to health care.

But testimony offered recently in a hearing held by the House Civil Practices Committee shows that the healing process for our health-care system has begun.

Christus Health, a not-for-profit Catholic health system with hospitals throughout Texas , is projecting a $20 million savings on its liability costs this year. Christus has earmarked these savings for patient services, expanding its already high level of charity care. Christus officials say the $20 million savings is a direct result of recently passed lawsuit reforms.

An OB/GYN group in Fredericksburg announced it would again deliver babies. The three doctors had stopped the obstetrical portion of their practice due to an inability to pay the malpractice premiums for that portion of their medical practice. Expectant mothers in that area of Texas no longer will have to travel to San Antonio for prenatal care and to deliver their babies.

The two neurosurgeons in Bryan will continue their practice in that community. These were the only neurosurgeons in Brazos County . They had already announced their departure, but because of the relief in premium expense, they will stay.

Four new anesthesiologists have agreed to move to Beaumont . Four nursing homes, two in Austin and two in San Antonio , are able to continue to provide a home and health care to 600 elderly Texans.

In short, the lawsuit momentum against health care providers has stopped and the early signs are it is turning around.

The state's largest carrier, Texas Medical Liability Trust, lowered its rates on Jan. 1, by 12 percent and a smaller carrier, Continental Casualty Co., cut its rates by 11.5 percent. The nation's largest physician insurer, The Doctors Co. , wants to expand its market share in Texas . Planned rate increases by other carriers have been put on hold.

Essentially, every doctor in Texas is either paying less malpractice premiums today or avoiding the pre-Prop. 12 scheduled increase in premiums. Texas Insurance Commissioner Jose Montemayor stated this was clear evidence of the beginning of a downward trend. Not only have rates begun to stabilize but 10 new insurance carriers have applied to enter the Texas medical liability market. That's additional good news for doctors desperate for rate relief and a reversal of the trend that forced 13 of 17 medical liability underwriters from Texas . New competition will have the effect of driving prices down. With more choices and lower prices, health-care providers will benefit from this healthier and more competitive malpractice insurance market. This has and will continue to translate directly into increased access to health care for Texans.

The president-elect of the Texas Trial Lawyers Association stated it is unlikely that the volume of future lawsuits will ever exceed one-half to two-thirds of pre-reform levels. This is an indication that many past suits should have never been filed at all and that the reforms in HB 4 are working to discourage the filing of non-meritorious lawsuits.

In contrast, Oklahoma doctors are seeing their insurance rates double this year; and despite passing comparatively watered-down reforms in Florida , its physicians are being hit with a 50 percent rate hike. Thankfully, this is not the story in Texas .

In Texas , happily, the early news is very good. The full effects of the reforms passed by the Legislature and approved by the voters have not yet been realized. It is early. The huge spike in the number of suits filed before the reforms became law has not worked its way through the system. Disturbingly, one carrier is trying to bypass the increased regulatory supervision of the Texas insurance commissioner because of a federal law loophole. Continued monitoring is needed to ensure that the enacted legal reforms translate into increased access to health care. Nonetheless, the early signs are that the Texas health-care system is recovering and the prognosis is good. That's good for doctors, hospitals and other health-care providers, and its good news for the people of Texas."

http://www.calahouston.org/Prop12-HealthCare.htm

 

The Health Care System likes what Prop. 12 did.  The Insurance Companies are happy.  My doctor bill went up $10 last year.  I'll need to give it more time before I can say I'm happy with my bill, but I am happy to have good doctors.

With Love,


CtrlAltDel aka Dave
C4/5 Complete - 28 Years Post
Texas, USA 


Sherry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Well yall...Hey.
   I  didnt want to  start a debate here, but I assure you, should you check facts and not propagana thrown out there  by the AMA and insurance lobbies, you would know
1)   There are more doctors now per capita than ten years ago.  
Are some of them moving? Yes..why? Good old competition.   How much money does a doctor stand to make in a very rural setting, as opposed to a bigger city/hospital?
 
 When you need medical care,  or tests,  I bet you head to the best facility around. Not the mom and pop 2 horse hospital.
 
2) NO  ..I repeat NO frivoulous Medical malpractice suits EVER make it to court.  IF an attorney happened to file one which is deemed 'frivoulous" there are countless obsticles which prevent it from ever seeing the light of day.   Several federal Senators had even posed bills to address the filing of frivoulous med. mal lawsuits, but the AMA wouldnt have anything to do it ( nor the insurance lobby) as it didnt line their pockets.
 (see the graham durbin bill for one)
 
3)  Yes the doctors insurance rates are skyrocketing... WHY? As reported to congress by the insurance lobby, "less the projected profits)  One Med mal insurance company anuals came out and a 37 million profit, wasnt enough.   The insurance companies also set up 'litigious zones"
   ONE negligent doctor has a suit filed agasint them..(like the doctor who decided to use a screwdriver in place of  rods on someones spine) And ALL the doctors in the area rates go up. As it is now deemed a 'litigious zone"  ..Funny..it's not the negligent doctors fault.. its the citizens who live there.  
  NO state that has passed a cap has the docs insurance rate gone down.  Ca now has legislation to repeal theirs, as has been touted,  a child died because of a doctors  extreme neglience and the family couldnt even file a case.   HOWEVER, what did help rates was the Ca passing of prop 103,  (years after caps)  WHich proves , Insurance reform, NOT tort reform.
 
You as a disabled person, would have no recourse to file a case if the doctor say decided to remove your lung instead of your toncils...mmm how caring of people is a doctor going to be that isnt getting reimbursed by the patients insurance company or medicare..AND the patient will not be able to sue?
  ANyway..I would suggest some fact checking before opinions are made based on pablum.
 
;) Sherry
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] cnbc's poll today

Elimination of frivolous lawsuits is the key.

Billy from Tampa

C2-3

9 years post



Stacy Harim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 
  Insurance rates are going so high for all doctors because of the law suits.  I don't think that is fair.  I think it should be only the doctor that performed mal practice.  Here in Maryland, we are losing many of our doctors because of the insurance rates.
 
Stacy


Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.

Reply via email to