Vary will said Stuntman
Wheelchair Warrior
Stuntman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stuntman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmmm,
So you want nobody to be charged for murder if a fetus is killed during
the commision of a crime?
At what point does the right to life extend to the unborn?
Remember, it was originaly intended for abortion to be performed ONLY
during the 1st Tri-mester, unless the mother's health was in danger.
Society has slowly accepted extending that time period through
brainwashing that "a woman can do what-ever she wants with her body"!
BS!
She should make up her mind in that 1st tri-mester.
After that, there is another life with a right.
Stunt
>
> Excellent points John! I totally agree! It's so refreshing to hear
a man say this, "I always find it strangely perverse that men seem to
want to control women and what they do."
>
> Corie (a woman who does not feel the government has the right to tell
me what I! can and cannot do with my body!)
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [email protected]
> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 5:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] stem cell research
>
>
> Lets be a bit careful here. We all have different beliefs. Roe v
Wade didn't create a law, it struck down laws that are
unconstitutional. I don't feel that the gov't has the right to tell me
and whatever doctor I choose what I can or can not do. I always find it
strangely perverse that men seem to want to control women and what they
do. Almost every religion grants men authority over women as if it was
a birthright. Because every religion sees it as a birthright.
>
> Nobody wants to adopt American children(thank you Oprah and Sally
Jessy) Most Asylums and Orphanages have been closed in the past 40
years because of ! the "stigma" they caused. Now unwanted children are
sent to foster homes that have loose oversight and are almost always
under funded. Where is that church money? Why isn't it morally
important that unwanted children are taken care of.
>
> We are a nation of laws as long as the laws are agreeable with us
today. Tomorrow, who knows? I find it incredibly hypocritical that
people would picket and denounce abortion when they have yet to adopt
an American child and picket the fertility clinic. To top that off,
they are all extreme conservatives that feel they pay too much in
taxes. How do we begin funding an extra 1.5 million unwanted children
each year? (By the way, that is 5800 abortions each day and that
doesn't include holidays when the clinics aren't open)
>
> Some serious problems that won't get better with name calling and
really has nothing to do with cloning cells or using human eggs or
embryos to cu! re many of the health problems of people who have been
given the gift of life, if not the quality.
>
> If you don't believe that we are here as a result of evolution from
lower life forms, then how can you have a faith that says that some
cells, visible only under a high powered microscope, constitute a human
life?
>
> john
> In a message dated 5/27/2005 7:43:21 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Funny,
> When a person stands by the morals they believe in, are they the
closed
> minded one?
> I guess SOME people haven't been paying attention on how easily
the
> activist judges pervert well meaning legistlation.
> Roe VS Wade: Intent; to make it "LEGAL" for a woman to get an
abortion
> during the "FIRST" Trimester.
> Activist Judges have:
> 1) turned a "LAW" into a "RIGHT" illegaly w/o an Amendment
> 2) extended that "Illegal Right" to ! minors w/o parental consent
> 3) now fighting for "partial birth" abortions
> 4) forced TAXPAYERS to bare the financial burden for approx 1.5
MILLION
> Abortions each year
>
> Child Abuse: has been perverted into parental control by the CPS
>
> Can you imagine how far they could pervert cloning?
> Yes, I agree in stem cell research.
> No, I'm against human cloning.
> But the wording of ANY law regarding it must have no loopholes
for
> activist judges.
>
> >
> > At 09:39 AM 5/27/2005, QuadPirate wrote:
> > >And in America Bush's religeous beliefs are supposed to be in
no way
> > >involved in his decisions as our president, he's supposed to
be
> listening
> > >to the people not the voices in his head.
> >
> > I don't know how you figure that. Everyone makes decisions
based on
> their
> > o! wn religious or non-religious beliefs.
> >
> > So Mark, do you think that any person who has religious beliefs
is
> just
> > listening to voices in their head or just people who don't
agree with
> you
> > and your beliefs?
> >
> > Jim
>
>
>
--
Freedom: United States Constitution� 1791 All Rights
Preserved
My first Domain
http://nw-in.com/index.html
http://quads.nw-in.com/quad-enter.html
Pics
http://quads.nw-in.com/quad-list/quad-list1.htm
Home page.
http://tnthompson0.tripod.com/homeincyberspace/
Computer Graphics portfolio.
http://tnthompson1.tripod.com/index.htm
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
