Had we not:
Sadamned, Uday, Usay and Co. would STILL be torturing, raping, 
murdering, supplying money to Terrorists, and storing MORE money stolen 
from the UN Oil for Food program (which would NOT have been uncovered).
Libya would STILL be harboring Terrorists and using Iraqi scientists to 
work on WMD's (including nukes).
Syria would STILL be occupying Lebenon.
France and Russia would STILL be selling arms illegaly to Iraq. 
Islamic facists would STILL be training in NE Iraq.
And the really big problem of dealing with Sadamned at a later date 
would probably been ten fold.
That money was being put away to restart his weapons programs as soon 
as the 91 sanctions were lifted.
When you warn of "Dire Consequences" you have to back it up with action.
That's just the facts.
Stunt

> 
> 
>  
> We didn't "need" to fight. I know it is very uncivilized to be 
against war  
> in principle. 
> 
> john
>  
> In a message dated 6/6/2005 5:05:59 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> Ray,
> I'll bet your getting your news from places like Al  Gezeera.
> IF France had stood WITH us regarding the UN resolution 1441  (which 
> they signed) instead of stabbing us in the back by staying away  from 
> the table and telling Sadamned we wouldn't invade w/o their 
approval,  
> WE WOULDN'T HAVE NEEDED TO FIGHT!
> Through the use of expensive  technology, the number of "innocent 
> civilians" killed, was far less than  the numbers Sadamned and co 
would 
> have caused in the same time  period.
> Are you blaming us for Foriegn Insurgent atrocities too?
> BTW  just how many nations have we "taken"?
> Our country in less than a century  has freed more people than the 
rest 
> of the world combined.
> We did it  without putting a price tag on freedom.
> Stunt
> PS. Our Bill of Rights  seems to confuse many around the world. They 
are 
> limitations placed on the  gov. Our 2A is prevents the gov from 
taking 
> steps which "could" lead to  draconian gun control. It is also why 
Japan 
> and Germany knew any attempt  to invade our country would fail. 
> Ironicaly, in those places where guns  have been banned, Violent 
crime 
> flourishes. Our two most dangerous cities  (Chicago & DC) have banned 
> guns and lead our country in murder rates.  We were right that when 
you 
> outlaw guns, only the outlaws will have them.  We have over 20,000 
gun 
> laws in our country, so it's ironic people want  more gun control. 
It's 
> a matter of enforcing the laws we already have,  combined with re-
> introducing the teaching of morals which "Political  Correctness" has 
> removed from our society. 
> 
> > KRATT,
> >  YOUR RIGHT!
> > You guys think you are justified in every country or  nation you 
> invade, 
> > killing innocent people.
> > We know the  reasons for invading Iraq. Sure wasn't for the WMD. 
Your 
> country 
> >  should take
> > care of its own problems instead of spending billions of  dollars a 
> day 
> > somewhere else and going
> > farther into  debt..Say like healthcare, unemployment, gun control 
> just for 
> >  starts!
> > Closing the border only put yours on the unemployment  line.
> > We have a reason to be PISSED...
> > 
> >  Ray
> >
> 
> -- 
> Freedom: United States Constitution� 1791 All Rights  
> Preserved
> 
> My first  Domain
> http://nw-in.com/index.html
> http://quads.nw-in.com/quad-enter.html
> Pics
> http://quads.nw-in.com/quad-list/quad-list1.htm
> Home  page. 
> http://tnthompson0.tripod.com/homeincyberspace/
> 
> Computer  Graphics portfolio.  
> http://tnthompson1.tripod.com/index.htm
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Freedom: United States Constitution� 1791 All Rights 
Preserved

My first Domain
http://nw-in.com/index.html
http://quads.nw-in.com/quad-enter.html
Pics
http://quads.nw-in.com/quad-list/quad-list1.htm
Home page. 
http://tnthompson0.tripod.com/homeincyberspace/

Computer Graphics portfolio. 
http://tnthompson1.tripod.com/index.htm

Reply via email to