From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Budget Cuts hurt us Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:24:44 EST In a message dated 11/16/2005 10:41:00 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I really hate to say I told you so...but I did Call you Senators now if you want to save your ass. Here's what I sent: I am a 55 year old, double amputee quadreplegic receiving Medicare andMedicaid. I am on SSDI so I can't afford a lot of medical bills. The cuts in Medicaid and the changes (listed below) would force most people like me to beplaced in a nursing home.I urge you to oppose these cuts/changes. I spent 17 years in a nursing home (1971-1988) and learned that living in an assisted living situation was notjust better for me, but cheaper for the government.If these cuts/changes are implemented, you'll be sentencing me to a "prison"-- the nursing home. Proposed cuts/changes: Medicaid-Slashes the Medicaid program by $45 billion over 10 years. The Presidentâs budget calls for cutting Medicaid by $45 billion over the next 10 years. This large Medicaid cut would have a particularly negative effect on individualswith disabilities. Medicaid is the only source of appropriate health andlong-term care services for nine million children and adults with disabilities. It gives children with severe disabilities access to physical and occupational therapy so they can lead healthy and more active lives and continue to liveat home with their families; and participate actively in the community in which they live. It also provides essential supports so that adults withdisabilities can live in the community, rather than in inappropriate institutions. Slashing Medicaid funding will have a direct impact on the services availableto these nine million children and adults. -Contains provisions that begin turning Medicaid from an entitlement to ablock grant. The Presidentâs budget also contains provisions that will bedamaging to those with disabilities by beginning to turn Medicaid from anindividual entitlement to a block grant to the states. The individual entitlement to Medicaid â with its critical federal protections and the open-ended financing system â has been of immense importance to individuals with disabilities â and anything less will threaten their access to vital health care services.Housing -Slashes housing program for people with disabilities by 50 percent. ThePresidentâs budget would cut funding for the Section 811 Supportive Housing forPersons with Disabilities program in half, cutting funding down to $120 million from its current level of $238 million.Completely eliminates HUDâs 30-year pledge to produce accessible supportivehousing for people with disabilities. The Presidentâs budget also wouldcompletely eliminate all funding for new unit production under the Section 811 program, leaving only tenant-based subsidies. Historically, 75 percent of HUDâs811 appropriation has been used to fund capital grants and project-based rental assistance for non-profit disability groups to develop new fully wheelchair-accessible units of permanent supportive housing. Represents an unprecedented shift of housing assistance away from peoplewith more severe disabilities. The Presidentâs proposal to eliminate the Section 811 production program would have a particularly harsh impact on those withmore severe disabilities. Historically, new units of supportive housingproduced through Section 811 have been targeted to people with the most severe disabilities who rely on SSI income of $600 or less per month. For almost 30years, this program has been a cornerstone of state and local efforts toimplement community integration strategies for people with severe disabilities who otherwise live in nursing homes, public institutions, or at home with agingparents. Employment -Weakens the vital Rehabilitation Services Administration, by slashing itspersonnel and closing regional offices across the country. The RehabilitationServices Administration in the Education Department plays a criticallyimportant role in helping people with disabilities prepare for entering the workforce, with key vocational rehabilitation programs. And yet the Bush budget includes a reorganization plan of the Rehabilitation Services Administration that weakens this key agency, by slashing the number of employees from 138 to 70and closing all of the regional offices. Closing all regional offices will result in a lack of monitoring and technical assistance for rehabilitation programs across the country.Completely eliminates vocational education program â an important employmentprogram at the Education Department that helps people with disabilitiesprepare for work. The Bush budget eliminates funding for vocational education. This translates into a loss of over $1.3 billion in resources that are used for training and improved academic achievement. Eliminating vocational educationwill deprive thousands of students with disabilities, as well as many non-disabled students, of vital training and work experience that lead to productive, full-time employment. Slashes funding for an employment program solely dedicated to people withdisabilities. The Bush budget slashes funding for an employment program at theDepartment of Labor that is dedicated to helping people with disabilitiesobtain appropriate employment. The budget cuts funding for the program from$47.5 million in FY 2005 to $28.0 million in FY 2006. Completely eliminates funding for grants for assistive technology --technology that a person with disabilities often needs in order to be in the workforce. Assistive technology for people with disabilities is often essential in order for them to live independently and be in the workforce. And yet the Bushbudget eliminates funding for State Assistive Technology Program Grants,that states use to help individuals with disabilities obtain such equipment. This funding is eliminated despite evidence that this program has benefited communities, the economy, businesses, and individuals with disabilities. Thisprogram provided $25.7 million for assistive technology in FY 2005. Education -Provides less than 50 percent for special education of what is authorizedunder the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA). The Bush budget proposes only a $508 million increase for special education in FY 2006, requesting only$11.1 billion. This is $12.7 billion below the amount authorized under theIndividuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA). Despite President Bush promising tofully fund IDEA, at this rate of increase, full funding will never beaccomplished. This marks the fifth year in a row that President Bush has failed to put us on the path to fully funding IDEA. Lack of funds for special education results in inadequate materials for students with disabilities and a chronic shortage of special education teachers. Furthermore, by shortchanging specialeducation, schools and school districts are strained as they scramble to find funds to pay the balance. Respectfully, William Jenkins
There was a lot of heated debate on here during the last presidential
election. I was anti-Bush then and am moreso now. Opinion polls seem to show
the rest of the country is starting to agree. I know of nothing that Bush
has improved except the pocketbooks of the rich. I am glad to see them
finally getting shot off their phony moral high-horse.
- FW: Re: [QUAD-L] Budget Cuts hurt us William Willis
- Re: FW: Re: [QUAD-L] Budget Cuts hurt us Lori Michaelson

