I hate to think it, but does anyone suspect that Bush
might have been involved in causing 9/11? I didn't think that when
it happened, he seemed genuinely upset, and stepped up to take action.
That's why I'm wondering now. Cuz that attack basically made him
acceptable and respected by America. What are anyone's thoughts on
this.
I'm not saying I think he was involved, but
conspiracy is always hiding somewhere in the government and politics.
Even if the President doesn't know it.
-Angelique
RollinOn wrote:
| You
know I was a Bush supporter until I opened my eyes and started researching
the Big Picture.It turned out I was wrong about Bush because he was lying
to all of us. We had no threat from Saddam and they knew it.Mustard
gas has a shelf life of 2 months so that was useless even if he had any.He
had nothing to threaten Americans at all except a dislike for us.He knew
if he tried anything we'd do exactly what we've done and remove him from
power and you can bet he didn't want that.We had him right where we wanted
him.This war isn't about WMD's like we were told it's about oil and their
plan to get Democracy in the Middle East which isn't a bad thing but the
way it was done had extremely poor judgement and has cost us lots of American
lives and shattered our position as World Leaders. We started a war and
from looks of things it's turned into WW3. Here's a dvd you'll find
interesting.Uncovered: The Truth about the war in Iraq.It interviews CIA
officials General and Inspectors and many more. Mark
-------Original Message-------
Date: 07/23/06 18:59:51
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L]
Viewing the "Big Picture"
Bush
jumped at Sadam to finish what his daddy started - Very few yelled at GHWB
in '91 . Sadam was the biggest bully in the area blowing all sorts
of rhetoric at us - he needed spanking. It seemed it would
be 'free'.O'C In
a message dated 7/23/2006 4:03:59 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Your
right on Dave! Nature has to take its coarse, if every embryo became
a human the world would be so over populated no one could servive.
Were already on the road to self destruction, hell if nature took it's
coarse none of us quads would alive to worry about stem cells. Don't
get me wrong I won't to walk again, and im glad for modern medicine that
save so many lives. Think about it! Not so long ago when someone
was critical there was no cure so nature took it's coarse. I think
Bush doesn't won't to see a cure , same way as he's put so many in harms
way all over the world. Nature means less population! Silas
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
Sunday, July 23, 2006 2:59 PM
Subject:
Re: [QUAD-L] Viewing the "Big Picture"
Jim,How
do you feel about us killing cows and chickens to eat? What about
euthanizing dogs and cats at the pound to control the population?
Do rats and monkeys fall into the protected group? How about
killing flys and mosquitoes - they feed the larger animals you know. In
a related point - our Catholic priest said today birth control like condoms,
creams and IUDs are a violation of God's natural law but family size can
be regulated by practicing abstinence during times of fertility.
He didn't cover vasectomies or tubal ligations but I think those would
be considered violations of natural law as well. As
long as 'God's natural law' is the topic, where do you think artificial
resuscitation figures in? If you blow somebody's lungs up a few times
and he comes out of it is that different than breathing for him the rest
of his life? The lines get pretty fuzzy.DaveP.S.
I believe in the natural law that the strongest survive and the rest are
at their mercy. In
a message dated 7/23/2006 2:15:12 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
At
01:27 PM 7/23/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It
is not ok to kill people. We are talking about exploiting the availability
of human tissue. Just stem cells. These are not and never will be humans.
These are unassigned cells. They have no thoughts, no ambitions, no sense
of self, and most importantly, no womb.
If I gave you
all the pieces of a an automobile, you would not own a car. Even a good
mechanic would only own junk because of the lack of tools. It isn't
the big picture, its the small minds.
john
Just another
thought about what should be considered "a human life". At this point in
time, I do believe that a human egg and human sperm make a human being
from the time they are joined, from that point the zygote contains all
the 46 chromosomes need to be human and it continues to develop.
When NASA scientist
talk about "life on Mars" they are talking about microscopic bacteria.
-
ALH84001 - The Life
on Mars meteorite
-
On August 7, 1996,
an historic press conference was held at NASA Headquarters in Washington
DC. News that scientists had found evidence of life in a Mars meterorite
had leaked out, and NASA had to make an announcement. A few minutes before,
President Clinton made these remarks at the White House before heading
out on a trip to California:
-
"This is the product of years of exploration and months of intensive study
by some of the world's most distinguished scientists. Like all discoveries,
this one will and should continue to be reviewed, examined and scrutinized.
It must be confirmed by other scientists... I am determined that the American
space program will put its full intellectual power and technological prowess
behind the search for further evidence of life on Mars."
-
At the press conference,
several scientists from NASA and Stanford University announced their findings
-- they confirmed that they had found evidence of ancient, fossilized,
microscopic life from a Martian meteorite, known as ALH84001.
-
Implications of
Mars Life
-
While the life
they talked about was only microscopic, it has several implications for
us macroscopic creatures. If life on Mars is ever proven to exist (or have
existed at some point in time), it would mean that the creation of life
is not something that happens because of freak chance or divine influence,
but is in fact a probable occurrence given the right conditions. Even
further, if all that life requires is an aqueous solution like liquid water
to grow and thrive (which is the current theory), then the universe is
literally teeming with life. The suspected liquid water oceans on some
of Jupiter's moons (Europa and Callisto) could be filled with life, and
life could still be present underneath the Martian surface, where liquid
water and thermal energy are still present.
-
(source: http://www.marsnews.com/focus/life/
)
No one called those
scientist "nuts" or "lunatics". President Clinton called them "some of
the world's most distinguished scientists."
If that's what
scientist consider "life" then why not, on the basis of a complete biological
analysis, the living human embryo - from the moment of the union of the
gametes - should be considered a human being with a well defined identity?
(paraphrased from the document "Scientific
and Therapeutic Use of Human Embryonic Stem Cells" http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_academies/acdlife/documents/rc_pa_acdlife_doc_20000824_cellule-staminali_en.html
).
Given the
right conditions, the human embryo will continue to develop and grow.
----
Jim Lubin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://makoa.org/jim
disAbility Resources:
http://www.makoa.org
Please Help:
Inkjet
& Toner Cartridge Recycling
Dave
www.daveoconnell.com
c3-inc-1967
Dave
www.daveoconnell.com c3-inc-1967 |
|
