But hiring spiraling down hill mentally challenged relatives continues, the Bush family legacy actually going back to the "I do not recall president".
Hillary shows just enough of her hand that is required at the time. Seems her healthcare proposal on the back shelves in spite of short comings, would behoove the average American more than the year old pre-emptive Iraqi invasion plans of our present administration entered office with ? In spite of all the worst which could happen, Hilary's Stem Cell support would catapult health cures into the digital age opposed to the medical dark ages where even Mrs. Regan pleaded to our Republican policy maker. No matter how hard Hillary tries, she will always be "the Clintons" and bashed for it. In its time and in hind sight, healthcare + cures has always been on the Clintons' agenda with a strong SSI future. I hope this is appropriate Q-list material, it might get all of us STANDING in support of Hilary For President in her second term. A Non-Party Voter, Merrill Universal healthcare will be seen shortly regardless of financial or citizen status. As a disabled minority member speaking for the vast amount of health cures through stem cell, isn't that technology so hugely awesome to offset possible failures? Simply a medical fact kept in the dark ages. Pharmaceuticals and healthcare lobbyists like medical care comfortably just the way it is. Reminds me when people were afraid computers would take away jobs. Hilary wants to take us there (cures through stem cells) as badly as Kennedy wanted to go to the moon, Bill Clinton to put a computer into every classroom, save SSI and balance the budget, or George W. B whatever it is. _____ From: Ken Gardiner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 3:05 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] VA Hospitals More of this is what you can expect if Hillary gets her way with universal government run health care. On Mar 3, 2007, at 3:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: During the vietnam war it became a habit to undercut vets healthcare so Washington could make the war seem like it was the fault of a bunch of privates that we were there at all. We didn't just mistreat the healthy vets from that war. I think most of us understand that reguardless of how we feel about the war, our soldiers are doing their duty and should expect our best efforts when that causes them a disability. I would like to see them get jobs in Washington DC where nobody gets off their butts anyway. Loss of memory seems to be a job requirement when doing paperwork, too. It's a shame we need a war to get a new batch of bureaucrats, but I've written to encourage hiring disabled vets instead of mentally challenged relatives. john -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [email protected] Sent: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 4:07 PM Subject: [QUAD-L] VA Hospitals In a message dated 3/3/2007 3:04:17 P.M. Central Standard Time, <javascript:parent.ComposeTo(> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm late in reading this post, but just this week I read that Defense Secretary Gates has called the Army's treatment and care of its wounded soldiers at Walter Reed Medical Center as "unacceptable." The Army is taking this as a very serious matter and heads are already starting to roll. It is about time the military takes a serious look at their health care and makes some real changes. This information has been kept from the soldiers on the front lines too. Can you imagine the moral of any soldier going into combat knowing that the cheap contractor is providing those services too? W _____ AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at <http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/1615326657x4311227241x4298082137/aol?redir=ht tp%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eaol%2Ecom> AOL.com. _____ AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at <http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/1615326657x4311227241x4298082137/aol?redir=ht tp://www.aol.com> AOL.com.
