no deity at all...?   really..?  you know someone that  believes all of 
creation and life and the whole universe is just a chance  happening and that 
after 
we die physically, there is nothingness for us..?   i find that pretty hard 
to comprehend.   if no one had a deity to use  as an excuse for pillaging and 
plundering and fighting over medical  procedures, do you suppose all that would 
not happen?  would we all  get together for endless love-ins and camp-outs, 
or would we kill each other for  different reasons? 
a planless, meaningless, futureless existence - how strange and meaningless  
that would be.
dave
 
 
In a message dated 4/10/2007 7:19:32 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Not everyone believes in the same deity, anyway.  Not everyone  believes in 
any deity or deities.  Take the mythology out of the  equation, and a lot more 
things would be possible, I think.  I'm not  knocking anyone's beliefs or 
ideas about religion, I wouldn't do that, but  look at how much hypocrisy
and terror has been caused by the ideas, and in the names of religion and  
deities.
-Angie

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
All this sure was easier (philosophically anyway) in the old days when  
playing with God's work wasn't possible.  All medicine - treatments -  
procedures - 
are fiddling with HIS design and work.  It's pretty tough  to 'half-learn' 
anything once you get started.  HE didn't make us with  the 'give up' gene 
activated just because we are at a certain  level.   If so, it would have 
activated 
a long time ago.
Dave
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 4/8/2007 11:04:36 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I am against the whole IVF process that creates excess  embryos to begin 
with. 

The frozen embryos can continued to be  stored indefinitely. What's wrong 
with that? Are you concerned about the  energy being used to keep them frozen? 
The embryos that are unfrozen  eventually die a natural death, just as every 
other living thing, then  cremated. That is quite different then killing it by 
removing stem cells  to use in someone else. Even organ donors are declared 
dead 
by some  standards before there organs are removed. # S.5—Stem Cell 
Research  Enhancement Act of 2007 doesn't even do that; it just states that the 
 
embryos were in excess of the clinical need of the individuals seeking  such 
treatment. and would never be implanted in a woman. 

I want my  spinal cord repaired so I can breathe without a ventilator and 
possibly  move independently, but I don't want it so badly that I will end 
another  human life just for the possible improve my own life. I don't 
understand  
how those wanting to use stem cells from embryos can't comprehend that. An  
embryo is a human life, and put into the right environment, will continue  to 
develop and grow. I'm not so self centered that improving my life  should come 
at 
the cost of another life.

There are other sources of  pluripotent stem cells, sources such as umbilical 
chords and amniotic  fluid. There is also somatic cell nuclear transfer 
(therapeutic cloning)  which I don't have a problem with.

On a side note, my cousin just  gave birth to a son last week. He was the 
result of IVF from her egg and  her husband's sperm. They had 8 viable embryos. 
The first 7 she did not  carry full term. I'm happy for them that the last one 
she was able to  carry to term and mom and son are doing fine.

Jim

At 08:04  AM 4/8/2007, Dan wrote:

So what do you do with the  thousands of excess fertilized eggs that result 
from in vitro  fertilization? Store them forever? Ban the process? These excess 
eggs  are thrown into the garbage everyday yet I don't hear anyone  
complaining. So what's your answer.

Dan 


At 07:50 PM  4/7/2007 -0700, Jim Lubin said something that elicited my  
response:


Glad to see you partly  agree with me Dan. (yes I realize you were being 
sarcastic) I don't  agree with the part about having elaborate funerals and 
burying them,  but yes we must not destroy unused fertilized eggs created for 
IVF  
treatments.

Using unused embryos is not the same as organ  donation because organ donor 
are dead before organs are harvested.  Removing stem cells from an embryo kills 
the embryo. 

I've  listened to Dr Kerr from Johns Hopkins talk a few times about his  
research. _http://www.hopkinsneuro.org/tm/_ (http://www.hopkinsneuro.org/tm/) 
watch his  presentation at the 2006 symposium here 
_http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2767307331641285489&hl=en_ 
(http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2767307331641285489&hl=en)   
he mentioned that they want to use the embryos created for IVF  that are 
deformed (something to that effect) and can not be used for  in-vitro 
treatment. 
Now I can go along with using those that could not  be used to result in a 
pregnancy. 

I agree with S. 30: A bill  to intensify research to derive human pluripotent 
stem cell  lines


At 06:35 PM 4/7/2007, Dan wrote:

Yes, yes, yes! We must  not destroy all those useless fertilized eggs. We 
should let them  perish on their own and then we should have an elaborate 
funeral 
and  bury them in a tiny little plot of earth. AND we must not allow  
abortion at ANY cost. Thank you Jesus! Hallelujah! 

Dan, who  always gives great credence to anything authored by a reverend.  

At 06:15 PM 4/7/2007 -0700, Jim Lubin said something that  elicited my 
response:










SIX STEM CELL FACTS




    *   There are non-controversial alternatives worth  exploring; such as 
the reprogramming of ordinary somatic  (body) cells, the derivation of stem 
cells from amniotic fluid,  and (assuming that it can be shown that the product 
is 
not an  embryo), altered nuclear transfer.  
    *   Concerns about embryo destruction are not only religious;  but merely 
a healthy respect for the human capacity for doing  evil in pursuit of the 
good.  
    *   The search for cures is not the only motive behind ESC  research,; 
many scientists are interested only in enhancing  basic scientific knowledge of 
such things as cell signaling,  tissue growth and early human development.  



Source: Robert P. George and Thomas V. Berg,  "Six Stem Cell Facts," Wall 
Street Journal, March 14,  2007.

For text:

_http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117384191108736444.html_ 
(http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117384191108736444.html)   
----
Jim  Lubin                
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_http://makoa.org/jim_ (http://makoa.org/jim)  
disAbility Resources:  _http://www.makoa.org



_ (http://www.makoa.org/) 








Dave _Visit My Home  Page_ (http://www.users.qwest.net/~daveoc/index.html) 



 
____________________________________
 See what's free at _AOL.com_ (http://www.aol.com/?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000503) 
. 

 
____________________________________
Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with _the  latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! 
Games._ (http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49936/*http://videogames.yahoo.com)  


Dave  _Visit My Home  Page_ (http://www.users.qwest.net/~daveoc/index.html) 



************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.

Reply via email to